Moses Wannabes
How did Moses get to be the Big Show among evangelicals?

by
Michael Spencer

I like Moses. I didn't get up this morning and decide that I didn't like Moses. I don't have a Moses complex. I am not Mosesaphobic.

But something is awry and amiss out there in that vast amusement park known as evangelicalism. I haven't seen Moses bobblehead dolls yet.....well, maybe I have, but that's beside the point. Moses- not Jesus- has become a major focus of contemporary Christians. And not in a way that is Biblically healthy or balanced.

Moses is a major part of the unfolding story of God's Gospel. Aside from being the traditional author of the first five books of the Bible, Moses is a major character in both the Christian and Jewish scriptures. In the New Testament, Moses represents the Old Covenant and the Law. In fact, to say "Moses" is to say "scripture" for many New Testament authors.

In addition, Moses makes for a fascinating character study. In my high school Bible survey classes, we talk a great deal about Moses' mixed race background, his search for an identity, his issues with anger management and his conversations with God. At least three popular movies use Moses as the primary character. I understand the appeal of Moses. He is a combination of common human experiences and an extraordinary relationship with God.

Some of the most well-known passages of scripture are stories about Moses. The baby in the basket. The burning bush. "Let my people go!" The passage through the Red Sea. Scenes from Charlton Heston's portrayal of Moses in "The Ten Commandments" are etched in the minds of several generations of Christians.

As prominent as Moses is in the Bible, he is rarely held out as an example to Christians. One place where he is mentioned as a person to imitate is Hebrews 11.

Hebrews 11:24-28  By faith Moses, when he was grown up, refused to be called the son of Pharaoh's daughter, choosing rather to be mistreated with the people of God than to enjoy the fleeting pleasures of sin. He considered the reproach of Christ greater wealth than the treasures of Egypt, for he was looking to the reward. By faith he left Egypt, not being afraid of the anger of the king, for he endured as seeing him who is invisible. By faith he kept the Passover and sprinkled the blood, so that the Destroyer of the firstborn might not touch them.

In fact, a rather large portion of the New Testament book of Hebrews is devoted to making sure Moses is never given any place over Christ Jesus. There's no animosity toward Moses in that exposition, but both text and subtext make it clear that Moses is not the paradigm of Christians for living the life of faith. 

So please don't think I'm being hard on a good guy, because it's Christians who have decided to make Moses the focus of two significant movements in evangelicalism: Henry Blackaby's Experiencing God paradigm of Christian experience and the current interest in "Seeing God's Glory," particularly expressed in a remarkable amount of contemporary worship music.

Experiencing God is a phenomenon in evangelicalism, particularly among Southern Baptists who revere its author, Henry Blackaby, as a spiritual mentor and prophet to the contemporary church. Others have done a good job of critiquing EG, and I will leave it to my readers to sort through the good and the bad in Blackaby's work. I have concluded that EG, despite some strong points, has contributed to a shift of focus away from scripture and toward direct revelation to individuals. This shift has remarkable consequences, and deserves examination on it's own.

In EG, Blackaby presents Moses' experience at the burning bush as a paradigm for the entire Christian life. This paradigm is presented as the well-know "Seven-Realities" of EG. (A diagram that presents these points is found in EG.)

  1. God is always at work around you.

  2. God pursues a continuing love relationship with you that is real and personal.

  3. God invites you to become involved with Him in His work.

  4. God speaks by the Holy Spirit through the Bible, prayer, circumstances, and the church to reveal Himself, His purposes, and His ways.

  5. God's invitation for you to work with Him always leads you to a crisis of belief that requires faith and action.

  6. You must make major adjustments in your life to join God in what He is doing.

  7. You come to know God by experience as you obey Him and He accomplishes His work through you

Obviously, these points from EG are all substantially Biblical and true in some contexts (though Blackaby's comments on them are often highly anecdotal and problematic. ) The question is "Can an outline derived from the story of the burning bush be presented as the "key" to knowing God and experiencing supernatural direction in the Christian life?" Is an incident in the life of Moses a model for how one comes to "know God by experience"?

Blackaby's method is the approach to Biblical stories that is used by hundreds of thousands of preachers of every kind. Taking an incident in scripture and hanging teaching points on the narrative is common in all sorts of sermons. I have used such an approach many times, but my disagreement with Blackaby comes precisely at that point, because I know the hazards of the method. I believe he errs seriously in claiming that it is this story that contains a significant pattern for all Christians to follow; a pattern that can be called the "key" to coming to "know God by experience."

The New Testament does not use the burning bush incident, or any teachings derived from it, as particularly important in the Christian life. Blackaby's discovery of the realities of EG in the Old Testament is much like Bruce Wilkinson's discovery that the key to "enlarging your territory" lay in the obscure prayer of Jabez. Evangelical Christians are surely aware that Jesus taught extensively on how we "know" God, and he does not use the burning bush episode as his focus. In the Gospels, it is in believing, abiding in Christ,  obeying Christ and trusting Christ that we come to know God. God has revealed himself in Jesus in a way far clearer than in any Old Covenant example of experience.

More troubling is the experiential side of this teaching. Are we all supposed to have a burning bush experience? Does the Bible say that the pattern of Moses' experience will be our own? The Bible certainly shows us examples in the Old Testament that are useful to the Christian, but the purpose of these examples is to show that the same God who spoke to Moses in the burning bush and on the mountain, has now spoken to us even more clearly in and through His son, Jesus Christ.

Our personal experience is a sovereign work of the Holy Spirit, and will not follow in the pre-determined pattern of the experience of Moses or anyone else in or out of the Bible. Putting the burning bush episode as the template for all experiences of being called, or for the Christian life in general, is putting too much importance on a passage outside of its relationship to Christ.

For example, look at how Jesus uses the Old Testament story of "Jacob's ladder" in John 1. Rather than say, "Every Christian should have an experience of coming to know God through a revelation that wherever he or she is, God is with him or her," (a good application of Genesis 28,) Jesus says "Truly, truly, I say to you, you will see heaven opened, and the angels of God ascending and descending upon the Son of man." (John 1:51.) The story of Jacob's ladder is interpreted in the Gospel of John as pointing to the greater revelation that Jesus is God himself; "God with us."

How harmful is it to teach New Testament Christians using Old Testament examples? This is not a problem, if the Bible is rightly divided. But saying that the key to knowing God is not in exclusively in Christ, but in a direct, Moses' like encounter with God, is dangerously misleading. Thousands have taken the EG course and have begun putting their focus on hearing directly from God. "God spoke to me and said..." has become the final authority for many Christians as they shape their own spiritual lives around the experience of Moses.

Can anyone imagine a New Testament writer saying that the key to experiencing God comes in a direct encounter or experience like the burning bush? Blackaby is sincere in what he says, but he is Biblically off base to teach that the burning bush experience, rather than the Holy Spirit's sovereign work in each Christian's life, is the "reality" that leads to knowing God.

The New Testament consistently states that what the Christian has in Jesus is greater than any aspect of the Old Testament record. What we know of God in Jesus is greater than any revelation given to Moses, including that face to face encounter on the mountain. If that is the case, then why is so much contemporary praise and worship music concerned with that very episode?

At the risk of sounding like I am picking on some good guys, please take note of the following lyrics by the influential Christian worship group, Third Day. The lyrics are by no means isolated or unusual.

I caught a glimpse of Your splendor
In the corner of my eye
The most beautiful thing I've ever seen
And it was like a flash of lightning
Reflected off the sky
And I know I'll never be the same

Show me Your Glory
Send down Your presence
I wanna see Your face
Show me Your Glory

When I climb down the mountain
Majesty shines about You
I can't go on without You, Lord

And get back to my life
I won't settle for ordinary things
I'm gonna follow You forever
And for all of my days
I won't rest 'til I see You again

When I first heard this song used in a worship setting, I was somewhat confused as to what the lyrics meant. Soon I realized it is about Moses' "glimpse of glory" experience on Sinai. The chorus, however, is among the most common sentiments in contemporary worship music: We/I want to "see" the glory of God.

Far be it from me to attempt an explanation of the huge theme of God's glory as it is revealed in scripture. It is a magnificent topic that comprehensively ties together much in the plan of God in Christ. But to understand contemporary worship music and preaching's interest in this topic, we need go no further than the story of the Exodus, and Moses' encounters with God on Mount Sinai. Here, the glory of God was visual and observable, first to the people in acts and presence of God, and then to Moses as he spent time with God on the mountain.

It is curious that the tradition of Christian hymnody did not pick up on this theme, yet modern CCM can't get enough of it. This is probably the result of contemporary preachers applying the "glory" theme in the Exodus and Moses passages to worship and the Christian life. While this is just my theory, I think anyone can see in the song above the evidence of sermons they have heard that spoke about "mountaintop experiences,""coming down from the mountain" and so forth.

As churches have put more and more emphasis on experience in the corporate worship setting, "glory" language became more common. Revivals are the "glory" of God descending on a church. Manifestations of the Spirit are God's glory in the midst of his people. Intense and emotional worship experiences are glimpses of God's glory. The Charismatic/Pentecostal side of evangelicalism is not without stories of God's visible glory descending in a cloud during a meeting.

This hunger for a repetition of visible glory, and equating personal and corporate experiences with such glory, has made it much easier to sing about the glory of God in the way we encounter in contemporary worship music. We want to see your glory, say the songwriters. Meaning: We want to have an experience that we have labeled "the Glory of God."

In his book, Before the Face of God,  author and theologian Michael Horton demolishes the current resurgence of a gnostic "theology of glory" by reminding us that the glory of God was a traumatic, even deadly experience to sinful humans and even to God's people. The entire Exodus and Moses narrative teaches the need for a mediator, and it is the New Testament's affirmation that the glory of God has now come to us in the person of Christ. In fact, an even greater glory than that seen by Moses is now seen in the Gospel.

"And we all, with unveiled face, beholding the glory of the Lord, are being changed into his likeness from one degree of glory to another; for this comes from the Lord who is the Spirit." (II Corinthians 3:18) Here Paul is concluding a chapter that contrasts all the different kinds of visible glory in the Old Covenant with the glory of God revealed in the Gospel. When you read this chapter, you have to wonder....why are modern Christians singing about Old Covenant glory?

The reason is that they are actually singing about their own experiences. What Moses experienced has been equated with what may happen in corporate worship or in the mystical subjectivity of personal spirituality. Moses' glimpse of glory isn't the glory that was revealed when Jesus came to be the savior of men (John 1:14) but a glory of another kind- a far less glorious glory, because it is the glory of individual experience.

I can safely assume that Moses, given the choice of the glory of Sinai or the glory of knowing Jesus Christ, would have no trouble choosing. Certainly, Moses would never mistake the glory of any Charismatic worship service for the glory of the Son of God. The "glory" sought after in worship theatrics and music is hardly worthy of the term.

I've been a bit factitious saying that these Christians are "Moses wannabes." Moses knew that all of God's redemptive plan pointed to a savior, not to an experience. The mistake of modern Christians is in finding the heartbeat of Christianity in their own experience rather than in the glory of the cross and the empty tomb. They aren't following Moses. If they were, they would eventually come to Christ and want nothing else but Him.

Is there a glory of the new covenant that we should desire to experience? The glory of this new covenant age is the Holy Spirit poured out to exalt and magnify Jesus. New covenant worship isn't glory centered, but Christ centered. The new covenant community isn't praying to see the glory, it's following Christ, serving Christ and teaching Christ. The glory of the new covenant is not seen in  breath-taking visions, but in the amazing fact of a foot-washing, cross-carrying Christ.

Of Luther, who thought deeply about these things, one scholar said, "Luther's "theology of the cross" was his relentless conviction that God does his most characteristic work (love) and his mightiest work (the redemption of the world) precisely when he appears, from a human point of view, to be utterly helpless and useless." (My Spiritual Debt to Martin Luther, by Victor Shepherd.) This is His glory, and the glory of those who know God through Jesus Christ. No other glory is as compelling.

Michael@internetmonk.com                                                                  Comment at The IM Forum