![]() |
|
I Found
Heaven on 96.1 FM
The day after
Christmas, driving across western Kentucky, I found heaven on the
radio. Right there on the playlist following No Doubt and just
preceding some rapper talking about shaking your tail feather, was the
CCM ballad "I Can Only Imagine." WSTO 96.1
isn't a Christian station. It's a party mix of tunes for the club
scene. Lots of nasty lyrics, a little bit of frat rock, lots of b's and
f's edited out and innuendo dropped in. "I Can Only Imagine" stands out
like your Sunday School teacher Aunt Rose hitting the dance floor at
The
Bootilicious Lounge. This wasn't
the first time I'd found Mercy Me's catchy tune about what heaven will
be like playing on a "secular" radio station. I've been hearing this
song for months. Unlike the ambiguous hip-hop of Stacie Orrico and
Jackie Velazquez or the brief flashes of DC
Talk's "Jesus Freak" or Michael
W. Smith's pop ballads that I've caught on secular radio in the past,
"I Can
Only Imagine" has been a bona fide smash hit. It's been a rotating
standard
on this particular station for months. (One reader says the single has
been released in three different versions.) A little research will
verify
that Mercy Me's song has gone where no CCM song explicitly mentioning
Jesus has ever gone before. We're not
talking "Jesus is Just Alright With Me" or "Spirit in the Sky" here. "I
Can Only Imagine" is
the kind of ballad that you can do right in the middle of almost any
worship service these days and everyone likes it. Most find it a moving
worship experience. Unlike most CCM, this
song is openly about deeply held beliefs Christians immediately
recognize without consulting the dictionary of doublespeak, and Jesus
is right in the middle of the song, called by name It's pious,
politically
incorrect, and puzzling. At least to me. It even talks about glory.
That's pretty big on the churchspeak scale. In a day when
anti-Christian sentiment is clearly on the rise, when Christmas symbols
are banned and mentioning anything remotely related to Christianity can
get you sent to the university re-education camp, "I Can Only Imagine"
has spent most of a year on the secular charts. This isn't Stryper or
some song where you could just as well be singing to your boyfriend in
the hot tub, it's the kind of Christian music that usually turns
non-Christians off faster than you can say "TBN." Back in the
day when I really liked CCM, I tirelessly worked to get our local
stations to play artists like Phil Keaggy and Rez Band. The argument
then was basically musical. The music sounded like the music on the
radio, and was, in my young and expert opinion, just as good. So why
not play it?
The local radio stations never saw my point. I had no idea how radio
worked, of course, and when Amy Grant and other Christian artists
started appearing on the radio, I just thought it was an answer to
prayer. Some kind
of inexplicable miracle. What was
actually happening, of course, was the beginning of secular music
companies seeing the commercial potential in CCM. Today, that marriage
is rock
solid. CCM is money, and the appearance of CCM on secular radio is
mostly due to the miracle of the marketplace. Religious stuff sells big
in America. Thanks to everyone saying the Prayer of Jabez, I imagine. This, however,
doesn't really explain much of Mercy Me's success. Most of the CCM that
has
found its way to secular radio play has been ambiguous pop with the
overtly Christian elements hidden in the romanticized or obscure
lyrics. Artists
like Stacie Orrico will not turn anyone's head lyrically. U2's
Christianity is a matter of constant debate. But "I Can
Only Imagine" is so upfront it should send many listeners checking the
radio to see if
they are on the right station. There is one
topic, however, where Christian pronouncements are tolerated with
little objection,
and that is the subject of heaven. It is no accident that the most
popular CCM tune of all time is about heaven. People like
the idea that dead people are in heaven. Research shows that most
people believe most people are going to heaven, and that almost no one
believes he, or any dead people he knows, are in hell. Despite the
fact that the New Testament has almost as much to say about hell as
about heaven, there are goodly numbers of Christians who don't even
believe in hell, including many ministers and noted Bible scholars. Such an
interest in heaven appears in all kinds of music. It's not new or
unheard of. Note, for example,
the following common Bluegrass lyric: On Heaven's
bright shore (on Heaven's bright shore) Such a lyric
can be sung anywhere that bluegrass or country music are appreciated,
and no one takes exception at all. Heaven, where mama, grandpa and
other dear friends are waiting for us all, is going to get applause
from everyone in the room, religious or not. It's just a very appealing
idea, and everyone likes it except a few cranky atheists. There is good
evidence that post 9-11 America in particular is more tolerant of the
Christian idea of heaven than before that national tragedy. While our
temporary cultural spiritual spasms of churchgoing have faded into
memory, the idea
that all good people are in heaven persists, especially as we are
confronted with the
continuing loss of life in the war on terror, the war in Iraq and other conflicts.
Death
has become more real to a whole generation of Americans, so--not
surprisingly--the idea that heaven is a wonderful place we should all
want to go to--and will go to--is a big seller. While some
believe the success of "I Can Only Imagine" is an indication of
increasing spiritual hunger and interest in Christ, I tend to think it
is an
example of grasping onto the comfort of Christian hope without taking
hold of the cross and the Gospel. Mercy Me's song is about the
assurance of the joys of heaven. Nowhere in the song is there a word
about who this Jesus is, what He did to make heaven possible, or why
anyone is welcomed into heaven. (Certainly the Christian audience knows
all that background.) Sin and Christ's death as our gracious
substitute, repentance from sin and faith in Christ--these are nowhere
in "I Can Only
Imagine," and I suspect this is just as comforting to the WSTO audience
as the actual
lyrics. When a song
like this is popular, I ask myself what the non-Christian audience is
thinking about when they hear it and like it. What do
non-Christians relate to in this song? How can they hear it over and
over and like it? Americans are
near-universalists at heart. They believe that tunnel of light is
heaven for everyone except Bin Laden, Hitler and the people who are
really mean to children. Oprah's view of personal spirituality is the
dominant
view in America. Our specifically Christian--and exclusivist--heritage,
which can be overheard in the
bluegrass lyrics, will never get in the way of the basic common
person's feeling that any
good soul who is loved by his mother and is not a criminal will go to
heaven. Tragic times
bring this universalism to the surface. Reagan announced that all the
Challenger astronauts had touched the face of God. All the 9-11 victims
went to heaven. All the soldiers dying in Iraq are "home," according to
President Bush. Try challenging that cultural view of heaven with
the truth of the Bible. On second thought, be careful when you do that,
because it could get ugly. Particularly if sincere believers in other
religions are involved. I believe "I
Can Only Imagine" is operating in contemporary culture much the same
way a "roots" song on heaven operates in traditional, rural culture. It
speaks through religious language and imagery to a deeply held cultural
belief that may actually be at wide variance from the specific
teachings of that religion or of scripture itself. So we can picture
loved ones, soldiers,
even ourselves, in heaven and happy to be there. We can think about
going to heaven and what a great experience that will be. But we
haven't changed
our minds about the Gospel. In fact, we really don't think about
the Gospel when we are singing along with the song. It was Martin
Luther who suggested that no religion was a superior option when
compared to wrong religion, at least from the standpoint of the
Gospel. In that respect, the widespread acceptance of "I Can Only
Imagine" may be worse than an outright rejection of such a song
in the venue of popular culture. The popularity of the song probably
doesn't indicate hunger for the truth, but a desire for a message that
will sooth any anxieties about mortality brought up by these troubled
times. If we rejoice
that "I Can Only Imagine" is popular, we should also be concerned that
its popularity may indicate that popular culture is ready to
appropriate the comfort of the Gospel without embracing the heart of
the Gospel: Christ crucified. Christians who assume that the
non-Christian audience relates to this song in a "Christian/Biblical"
context are probably very mistaken. It is much more likely that we are
seeing people embrace the Christian hope of heaven, but without any
interest in Christ as the Way to heaven. If he welcomes us when we are
there, that's fine. Telling us how to go to heaven, however, isn't any
more popular now than ever. Which brings
me to one last observation. The popularity and success of "I Can Only
Imagine" indicates the progress of contemporary "Praise and Worship"
(P&W) music in general. Millions of people are fans of contemporary
P&W as they have heard it in church, on the radio or on recordings.
P&W has its own fan base, and it goes far beyond just those who
attend churches that use P&W in the context of worship. As a person
who ministers in an environment where contemporary P&W is used in
large student worship services, I can personally attest that many
people who are not Christians are devoted, emotional fans of the music.
I used to puzzle
at the emotional and physical reaction of some students to P&W
songs when I knew that these students had no interest in Christ at all.
I'm no longer puzzled, because I realize that the music--quite apart
from Christ or the Gospel--generates fans and emotional responses. To a certain
extent, we have to admit that "fandom" is a category all its own, and
certainly isn't the same as calling a person a disciple or even someone
modestly interested in following Christ. All we know is that they like
the song. This may be a large part of the success of "I Can Only
Imagine." Fans of CCM--who are not followers of Christ--are exerting
their particular kind of religiosity by asking for the song to be
played. It is
distressing to think thousands may be actually taking some false
assurance of salvation from their reaction to P&W songs or the
experience of contemporary worship. Just as invitationalism obscures
faith, the emotionalism of much P&W music tends to obscure faith,
and replace it with tears, dancing and singing along with the crowd and
the worship team. Certainly all kinds of worship styles run this risk,
as does all kinds of music, but contemporary P&W goes directly for
the experience, and its defenders cite the emotional outlet and
experience as a primary reason they know they are encountering God. It
all sets the scene for this tragic conversation. "But Lord, didn't I like 'I Can Only Imagine' and all those
other great praise choruses?" "I never knew you." Such is the
influence of CCM that it can now produce an explicitly Christian
product that non-believers like enough to listen to, even as they send
Christ himself to the garbage dump of irrelevancy. In evangelicalism's
project to influence the culture, we may have reached the ironic place
where being totally acceptable to the culture renders even explicit
Christian communication suspect because the context of the whole Gospel
isn't present or understood. How much of the gospel does the Holy
Spirit need to work? It is the Holy Spirit who is the true evangelist,
and He can take any song, any sermon, any experience and sovereignly
change a heart. But scripture itself tells us that the Spirit uses the
Word preached, and the question that must now be asked is this: What
are non-Christians thinking when they hear the message of Jesus and
heaven in the context of their own assumptions? Are they understanding
the Gospel, or does the communication medium's effort at acceptability
make the message in question part of the non-Christian appropriation of
cultural religion? In other
words, does a song about heaven, loved by the popular culture, creating
tears and good feelings, but existing outside of the proclamation of
the whole Gospel, really do that much good? While I would
hope and pray they are thinking of the Gospel, I tend to think that is
unwarranted optimism. Thoughts of heaven are not thoughts of the cross,
and it is only through the cross that sinful human beings may come to
heaven as welcome pilgrims. The fans of heaven are many, but few will
ever be there. It is imperative that the world hear the whole Gospel,
and hears the gospel in a way that refutes falsehood and error, and
gives Christ alone the glory of redemption. (Hence, all that scripture
about stumbling blocks of offense and foolishness.) This is why the
church has been given the charge to know the truth, teach it, pass it
on, preach it and evangelize with it. And this is likely why pop
culture relevance should never be a goal we are particularly excited
about. (Some
excellent and essential resources on the Gospel: Albert
Martin's tape series "Coming to Christ." Discuss
this essay at the IM Forum P.S. Boar's Head Tavern Member Tom Hinkle
suggests another verse might be needed: I can only imagine how hot that fire will be Surrounded by screaming, |