
Is School Out for Baptists?
Southern Baptists consider the benefits of
dropping out of public schools.
by Michael Spencer
"Contemporary Christianity in
America has become a self-absorbed culture
of protection against everything that is deemed threatening while
embracing every consumer driven gimmick that comes along." -
Steve McFarland
"If Baptist parents were to comply
with the resolution, the public
school system probably would collapse," said Pinckney, who publishes The
Baptist Banner. ''I think that would be one of the finest things
that can happen for the United States,'' he said. - Tennessean
article.
"Why should
we
be stingy in support of and apologetic about this plainly worthy public
school system? After all, our greatest national resource has been and
still is
our young people. Last year 43.5 million boys and girls were enrolled
in our
public schools, the largest number in our history. Every generation
requires a
shared experience....Genuine patriotism calls for strengthening,
not weakening, public education. We retrench at the nation’s peril.
Only one
generation of retreat would destroy this priceless resource that binds
us
together as a people."- Maston Colloquium Statement on Public
Education, 2001
The Southern Baptist
Convention is on the verge of a major debate about public education.
Resolutions urging Christians to abandon public schools are everywhere,
and one will likely be brought to the Southern Baptist Convention floor
this year or next. Homeschoolers, advocates of private Christian
schools and the many critics of public education seem to sense that the
hour has arrived to bring down the "evil empire" of godless, secular
public schools. The swords are out and battle lines are
being drawn.
I've long avoided writing about these issues because I knew that I
would, once again, be in a minority, but also because I am a teacher
and minister at a large private Christian school. How can I advocate
support for public schools? A wholesale evangelical withdrawal from the
public schools would be a boon to our school. The rhetoric of the
anti-public school movement could easily fit into our school's
advertising, though we have avoided anything more than modest
comparisons. Well, that's not who I am or where I am. I support public
schools both as a citizen and as a Christian, though certainly not
without thought and consideration.
I am a public school graduate, and proud of it. Twelve years of public
education at Lincoln Elementary, Estes Junior High and Owensboro High School.
(Go Red Devils!) Those years were some of the best memories of my life.
No bullies. No drugs. No abuse. Good times and a good education that
served me well. My dad graduated the eighth grade in a one room,
eastern Kentucky school. Neither of my parents attended college. There
were no books in the house where I grew up. Public school was a world
of hope and happiness for me, and I am not about to forget it when
times are tough.
While I wouldn't send my kids to every public school, I would send them
to most public schools without reservation. I would send my kids to
most public schools long before I would send them to most private
schools, because I fear distorted ideas about God more than I do the
absence of belief in God in a school. I would never homeschool my kids
unless it was an emergency, even though I am
college educated (and beyond), teach others, and could master
homeschooling in most subjects.
Yes, my kids attended and graduated from a private Christian school,
but OBI is not typical of private Christian schools, and the
similarities to
those schools (like young earth creationism and weird rules about
dancing) were among the few negatives in their experiences.
OBI does allow me a unique window on educational experiences. In our
ministry, I see hundreds of kids who have done poorly in public
school. I see the kids public schools can't help, failed to teach and
threw out for behavior. We get every kind of learning and behavior
disorder in the book. I read hundreds of pages of discipline notes
every year. I see the kids whose parents don't give a
nickel about the value of education and therefore let their kids stay
home 70+ days in a year.
We also deal with students from homeschools and private, church-run
schools. I see homeschool kids who are brilliant and homeschool kids
who are
five grades behind. I see homeschool kids who are scared of almost
everyone, but who usually come out of their shells and enjoy the
opportunities we provide. I see Christian school kids of every kind,
from great examples of excellence to obvious products of educational
incompetence.
I've got
strong opinions and impressions on all these education options and how
they work for
students. I have opinions about school boards, teachers and
administrators. I can bore
you if you want to be bored, or I can make you mad if you haven't been
fired up in a while.
I'm not a trained educator, just a private school teacher, an advocate
for kids and a
communicator. I'm not big on numbers, because I'm a bit skeptical about
how
they are used by both sides anyway. I believe there must be a place in
the picture
for every kind of education: public, private and home. The
strength of America (and of a non-fundamentalist Christian faith) is
the pursuit of the good and the true through diverse experiences. I am
hearing a lot of propaganda that doesn't match up with my
experience or the lessons of thirty years of ministry to
students and families.
I believe in Christian education, but I don't think you build great
Christian schools on the foundation of fear, but rather on clear
alternatives
of excellence
and love.
I don't think choosing one route as right for my family makes me the
enemy of those who go about education differently than I do. I'm tired
of hearing homeschools and Christian schools portrayed as cultic,
abusive and incompetent. I'm just as tired of advocates of Christian
education using slander and propaganda to mount a distorted attack on
public schools. I think there is a better way than these "either/or,"
worst case scenarios.
My own cards being on the table, I'd like to speak to the homeschoolers
and private schoolers in the audience. Listen carefully please.
I am not against homeschooling.
I recognize its value and accomplishments. One would have to be a fool
to not see the good things happening in the homeschool movement in
America. It's a choice millions of Americans make, and I fully support
them, if not all their reasoning and methodology. Same with private
Christian schools. I support them and I hope they grow.
I don't believe homeschool parents are
weird, abusive control freaks who are screwing up their kids.
I've read the fright pieces written by people who apparently feel
homeschoolers are a cult. Such accusations usually look at the extreme
fringe or the unavoidable bad examples and generalize into ridiculous
conclusions. I believe most homeschool parents love their kids and work
to make the homeschool experience a great one. I have no doubt
homeschooling done well can produce impressive results. While I have
some modest
critiques of homeschooling as I have seen its results in my ministries,
being cultic, abusive or dangerous aren't on the list. (If saying some
kids are "undersocialized" is too hard for you to hear, then
you'd better
stop reading.)
I believe that education is the moral
and Biblical responsibility of parents, not the responsibility of
government or anyone
else. Parents have the God-given right to determine what is the
best educational course for their children. If those parents choose
homeschooling, they shouldn't be harassed or regulated. I applaud
states that have a "hands off" approach to homeschooling. I also
applaud states that keep homeschooling, private schools and public
schools completely separate. (I'm not sure all my Southern Baptist
friends are on the same page.)
I enthusiastically applaud the
ministries of the thousands of Christian schools in America. I
applaud their excellence and accomplishments. I hope they flourish and
multiply, going into every community in America and making private,
Christian education an option for every family and child. While some
Christian schools are sub-standard or incompetent, that's not typical.
Christian schools do a good job in what they do. I salute the faculty
and staff of those schools, who serve at a fraction of what public
school employees are compensated. It's a labor of love, and thousands
of students are grateful for what those servants give in the name of
Jesus.
I believe that homeschooling and
private Christian schools are agents of the Kingdom of God. They
are doing Kingdom work. Their God-centered and Bible honoring
approaches
to education are a ministry of the Kingdom. They bring salt and light
into our culture, and they are making positive differences in lives
and communities. Even as I offer some disagreement, I am not at all
rejecting the work of these Christian education ministries. God is
using homeschooling and private Christian schools.
I am very aware of the culture war
going on in America's public schools, and the reasonable fears many
evangelicals have about sending their children into that battleground.
When Noel was in elementary school, I was happy with her public school.
I also knew what was waiting for her in our particular junior high and
beyond, and I
was concerned. In that community, I would have chosen a private school
for my children rather than send them to a public school that wasn't
doing a good job. I support any parent who looks at public schools and
says they are concerned enough to make another choice. I believe we
must, as Christians and citizens, oppose the indoctrination of children
into a worldview different from that of their parents, and we can't
support schools that don't provide a safe learning environment. I join
my
conservative friends in outrage at what teachers' unions and
educational activists have done to the public schools. While I don't
believe every extreme story, I know enough of them are true that I
would support any parents who said they couldn't send their child into
that environment. There is a time to go and work for change, and there
is a time to make another choice. I understand that thoroughly.
I am deeply suspicious of the concept
of "government schools." I understand that many Christians now
purposely speak of "government schools," and while I may disagree with
some of their intent in that language, I agree that the control of
schools by government raises some ominous possibilities. I
believe that education is a community interest, but not a government
mandate. Schools are unique institutions in communities, and flourish
when they are accountable to the families and communities in which they
exist, not to some expert in the capital. I believe government must be
a partner with citizens in
providing schools, but government cannot "own" or "control" schools to
the extent that they no longer are "community" schools reflecting
parental values and local vision. Public schools cannot be agents for
agendas far outside of the local community and the values of the
families
in their community.
I recognize that in some public
schools, an aggressive anti-Christian agenda pervades. Again,
without believing all the propaganda, I can agree that David Limbaugh
is correct in much of what he writes in "Persecution."
Without close monitoring by the community, the public schools can
easily become a reflection of a liberal agenda to render Christianity
irrelevant, and education is a primary tool in that quest. While I
don't see this as particularly new, I do understand that many parents
would not want their child in the hands of anyone hostile to
Christianity during their child's impressionable school days. As
confident as I am that Christian churches and parents can counter this,
I support those who
say they don't want to run the risks.
I believe the church should support
parents who homeschool or send their children to private, Christian
schools. With a diversity of educational options available to
Christian parents, churches are obligated to find ways to support
families who make differing choices. It is inappropriate for a pastor
to take the position that parents cannot send their children to public
schools, even if the pastor and church staff make the homeschooling or
private school choice. There are a variety of ways to support parents,
and churches should be circumspect in making every Christian parent
feel the church is their full partner in carrying out the
responsibility of educating their children. No parent should be told he
or she is disobeying God's Word and hurting his or her children by
sending
them to a public school.
The welfare of our children must be
among our highest priorities in life, and it must be something for
which we are willing to sacrifice and even suffer. At no time
would I want it to be said that I think some aspect of the Christian
mission is more important than caring for our children. I understand
that many families are making the choice to love their children when
they take them out of the public school, and that choice is fundamental
to a healthy family. As a parent who has been guilty of putting
ministry before family at times, I know that God will ask each of us
about our children long before we account for anything else in the
Christian life or mission.
The welfare, however, of all children
is an
extension of the command to love our neighbor as ourselves, and
therefore the welfare of all children in a community is the concern of
a
Christian citizen. Is it possible to embrace God's call to care
for our own children while at the same time realizing we have some
responsibility for the children of the community in which we live? Not
to raise someone else's children, but, to the extent allowed in our
culture, to influence those children for good? To influence community
expressions of concern and love for young people? To provide hope and,
yes, light? I think we need a
discussion
of the Christian approach to the public square (including public
schools) and not just a
discussion of how we love our own children or protect ourselves from a
fallen culture. Is it really an "either/or"
issue in deciding which kids will get a decent education?
If I've made it clear that I am no enemy of those who don't use public
schools, then I want to share why I
support the public schools, when so
many evangelicals are joining the movement to desert them.
1. Most parents- Christian or not-
can neither homeschool nor send their children to a private Christian
school. Tens of millions of America's children live in homes where
public schools are their only hope of an education and its benefits.
If the SBC
resolution signals the beginnings of a movement to start new Christian
schools and support more homeschools, that's great. But no one can
seriously look at the numbers--over 40 million students in public
schools--and think that Christian schools or homeschools can do
anything more than deal with a tiny minority of students. It's
imperative that Christians accept reality and develop an approach to
helping public school parents and kids. Many churches are already doing
so, and they should be applauded. The voices saying Christian schools
can educate America's children are...well...nuts, statistically
speaking. Get real. There are always going to be millions and millions
of public school kids in all kinds of public schools.
2. We must support the millions of
Christians whose vocations and ministries are in the public schools.
Perhaps the single most distressing thing about the current call for
Christians to abandon public schools is the stunning rejection of those
whom God has called to minister in those schools as Christian
administrators, teachers and staff. Every church I've ever served had a
generous representation of public school employees in the congregation.
Christian teachers were some of my earliest mentors as a new Christian.
My junior high principal was the interim pastor of our church for
years. I would see Christian teachers at school and then at church.
How can anyone in good conscience say these people are not where God
wants them to be, or suggest that God is calling them to abandon their
ministries to lost and hurting kids? It's bizarre and offensive. Maybe
Southern Baptists need to publish a list of vocations God never calls
you to. Do we really want to become churches where you can't stand
up and say, "God has called me to teach in the public schools" without
being booed?
3. The vast majority of America's
private Christian schools are 1) economically out of reach of poor
families and 2) open only to Christian families and/or students.
I am thankful that our school
is different in both areas, but the truth is many, if not most, Christian schools are
neither
affordable nor available to lower income, non-Christian students.
The drumbeat to abandon the public schools is not an invitation to
affordable, open Christian schools, because those schools are--by and
large--for middle income, already evangelical Christian families.
Outside of those groups, there isn't a desk for you. Why can't someone
be honest here? A good percentage of private Christian education seems
designed to get away from certain kinds of people. If it's not so, then
let's change some things to open those doors and end that impression.
4. Public schools are a vast open
mission field for ministries of many kinds. Despite the horror
stories, the fact is most public schools welcome Christians as
teachers, involved parents, staff and supporters. Many are desperate
for help. They need tutors, coaches, classroom assistants, etc.
Churches that work to help public schools find that the majority are
open to and grateful for that help. Only a small minority are closing
doors. "Faith based" ministries are not locked out in most of America's
public schools, even if they must operate on some limitations. Teachers
and parents are still able to wash feet, give cups of cold water and
meet needs in public schools. Yes, there may be limitations on open
evangelism, but that is no excuse to not go into the mission field of
the public schools. It's news when a school says a youth minister can't
serve as a volunteer counselor because it's not the usual response. If
we go with the right attitude and a missionary heart, the schools are
open, and Christ clearly calls us to "go," not "leave."
5. Christian public school students
may be some of the boldest witnesses in America. We need to support
them. I find it absolutely outrageous that the same denomination
that has been telling youth ministries for fifty years to develop
courageous witnesses in public schools is now saying abandon ship and
go to a "Christian school." Is the lesson of Columbine or Paducah that
America's Christian kids need to go hunker down in their own safely
protected schools with no unbelievers allowed?
Is the "See You At The Pole" movement now turning into the "See You at
the Homeschool Picnic" movement? Young people in public schools are
some of
the boldest witnesses in our culture, and we need to be encouraging
them to do more, not retreat. Who
can believe this is happening among
Southern Baptists?
6. Wholesale abandonment of the
public schools would be an evangelical disaster. Manufacturing a
"divine word" to abandon ship is fraudulent and arrogant.
Putting God's authority behind this very bad idea is typical of the
cavalier way some evangelicals now throw around the idea that "God is
leading" their personal preferences in the culture war. Deserting
public schools would be the most foolish and regrettable move ever made
by Southern Baptists, and blaming God for the suggestion won't ease the
blow when they are held up as giving up on what all good people know
can be a great place of Christian service. If Southern Baptists want to
abandon something, abandon the kind of bomb shelter fundamentalism that
justifies surrender and ghetto thinking with false statements of
authority and a misuse of scripture.
7. Many of the voices calling for the
abandonment of the public schools are being less than candid about
their entire agenda, particularly as it pertains to government support
of private schools and homeschooling. I probably agree with many
of those who seek a voucher system or more recognition of homeschoolers
in the tax code, etc. But could these advocates be honest about their
overall goals? If they want government support of religious schools in
any way, say so out front.
8. Thousands of America's public
schools bear little resemblance to the caricatures used to criticize
"government schools." If you live in most of America, you don't
recognize the portrayal of public schools you hear from many pulpits
and radio programs. That's not your school they are describing. You
know things are far from perfect, but you also
know your school does a good job. Most teachers work hard and care.
Most kids take advantage of the education. Coaches give opportunities
that shape lives. Fine arts make the community proud. The community
school is a deserving source of community pride. There are no condom
distributions or readings of gay literature. Christians aren't
ridiculed any more than at your job. For those in schools who are
rotten enough to feed the caricature, I say keep the
pressure on or take your kids elsewhere. But most schools are
reflections of basic American traditions and values, not just culture
war casualties and dangerous social breakdown.
9. The current problems in
public schools do not warrant the abandonment of the concept of a
"community school," an idea that most American Christians have endorsed
and supported for most of two centuries. As an American citizen,
I believe an educated population is essential to democracy. As a
realist, I know that Christian schools and homeschools aren't going to
do the job that public schools do for millions of students. Community
schools have always been supported by the majority of American
Christians as a way to love their neighbor's kids by providing a good
school. Education is a uniting experience in America, and public
schools make it possible. Yes, they have problems. Yes, we need them.
No, we cannot do without them. We need some ideas, but abandoning ship
is a terrible one.
10. Unless American Christians go to
drastic lengths to withdraw from culture entirely--and equip families
to thoroughly disciple their children in the Christian worldview--the
effects of withdrawal from public schools will be negligible.
(See Amish Christianity for examples, please.) The panacea implied in
the calls to withdraw are typical of fundamentalism's approach to
complex problems: Find a scapegoat and drive it over a cliff so we all
feel better. Well, if we burn public schools at the stake we won't have
driven the evil from our midst. We will have removed one of the great
forces for good in our culture. The destructive culture so many fear is
coming at young people from a variety of sources. In that regard, the
homeschoolers have it right. You must control the total experience of
growing up, and be with your children as much as possible. Involved
parents make a big difference for every kid in every situation, because
finally, it's the family, not the school, that has the greatest effect
on a young person.
11. Great Christian education doesn't
proceed from fear and ignorance, but from providing an alternative of
excellence and love. Christians have great alternatives, but we
don't have easy answers. Not in homeschool. Not in ABEKA books. Not in
Latin. Not in
Classical curriculum. Not in Charlotte Mason. Not in uniforms and daily
chapel. Our alternative should be love, truth and excellence. Great
education can happen in a lot of places, but I've never seen it grow
well
in the soil of resentment, fear and apocalyptic fundamentalism. Offer a
great alternative and let the world see the results. Don't fearmonger
and distort to motivate people.
There is so much else to say. Public schools provide great programs for
special education needs and children with learning problems. They are
the only realistic option for many--not all--of the Fine Arts
opportunities for high school students in rural areas. Athletics is
much criticized in America today, but I think our public schools do a
great job in keeping alive a solid amateur athletic tradition that
enriches lives and communities, and in
most cases, in tying those programs effectively to academic
performance.
I'm
grateful for the opportunities to serve and learn that were part of my
public school education. I earned a full first year scholarship to
college because my public school helped me to qualify. Some homeschools
and private schools can provide opportunities similar to public
schools, but public schools are unique in many, many places and many
ways, especially in rural areas and inner city areas where evangelicals
have fled
to the suburbs.
Evangelicals are beginning to be tempted by a different spirit than the
activism and optimism that has defined them for more than a century.
They are beginning to think of the safety of their own parallel culture
as preferable to the dangers of the culture. (Similar to what many
Muslims feel about Western culture. Interesting, huh?) Their own
schools,
entertainment, books, even communities. The response to this temptation
will define whether evangelicals are going to be salt and light, or a
city on a hill. You see, we must be ALL
those things and more. We must go into the world. We must love
as Jesus loved. We must do the hands-on, practical ministries. And we
must take care of our children and see that they are educated and
discipled.
The current calls to abandon the public schools are a wrong road to
those goals. We must go into the world, and not withdraw from it. I
don't know if Jesus would tell us to leave public schools or not. I
have a feeling he wouldn't be as interested in where a child went to
school as what the adults in that child's life had in their hearts. In
the judgment of some, that child is in danger of losing Jesus in the
chaos of public schools, and we must withraw from those schools to
insure our kids have Jesus. But others say Jesus is still in public
schools and Christians may love, serve and worship him there. As much
as I
applaud homeschoolers and support private schools, I say let's
remember that Jesus hasn't turned his back on the students, teachers
and families of America's public schools, and we shouldn't, either.
Michael Spencer
Comment
at The IM Forum