<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Mark Driscoll Shouldn&#8217;t Bug Ya</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/why-mark-driscoll-shouldnt-bug-ya/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/why-mark-driscoll-shouldnt-bug-ya</link>
	<description>...dispatches from the post-evangelical wilderness</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:48:13 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ashley</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/why-mark-driscoll-shouldnt-bug-ya/comment-page-3#comment-491404</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 20:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/?p=3526#comment-491404</guid>
		<description>It seems like Jesus gave an easy &quot;test&quot; for Mark or any of us.

&quot;You shall know a tree by its fruit&quot;

Does Driscoll preach the gospel?
Yes

Does the gospel bear fruit? 
Colossians 1:6....&quot; All over the world this gospel is bearing fruit and growing, just as it has been doing among you since the day you heard it and understood God&#039;s grace in all its truth.&quot;

Therefore-Philippians 1:18 &quot;What then? Only that in every way, whether in pretense or in truth, Christ is proclaimed, and in that I rejoice.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems like Jesus gave an easy &#8220;test&#8221; for Mark or any of us.</p>
<p>&#8220;You shall know a tree by its fruit&#8221;</p>
<p>Does Driscoll preach the gospel?<br />
Yes</p>
<p>Does the gospel bear fruit?<br />
<a href="http://www.gnpcb.org/esv/search/?go=Go&amp;q=Colossians+1%3A6" class="bibleref" title="ESV Colossians 1:6">Colossians 1:6</a>&#8230;.&#8221; All over the world this gospel is bearing fruit and growing, just as it has been doing among you since the day you heard it and understood God&#8217;s grace in all its truth.&#8221;</p>
<p>Therefore-<a href="http://www.gnpcb.org/esv/search/?go=Go&amp;q=Philippians+1%3A18" class="bibleref" title="ESV Philippians 1:18">Philippians 1:18</a> &#8220;What then? Only that in every way, whether in pretense or in truth, Christ is proclaimed, and in that I rejoice.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve R</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/why-mark-driscoll-shouldnt-bug-ya/comment-page-3#comment-490675</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/?p=3526#comment-490675</guid>
		<description>My mistake Monk - sorry to jump to conclusions and for briefly getting up on a soapbox. feel free to delete or moderate my comment.  Your blog is terrific; I&#039;ve enjoyed your opinions and reading it daily.

Peace to you as well
Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My mistake Monk &#8211; sorry to jump to conclusions and for briefly getting up on a soapbox. feel free to delete or moderate my comment.  Your blog is terrific; I&#8217;ve enjoyed your opinions and reading it daily.</p>
<p>Peace to you as well<br />
Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iMonk</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/why-mark-driscoll-shouldnt-bug-ya/comment-page-3#comment-490487</link>
		<dc:creator>iMonk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 00:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/?p=3526#comment-490487</guid>
		<description>Steve R: I was not calling you falsely pious or thinking of you when I wrote the sentence. I see how you made the connection, but that wasn&#039;t my intention.

Sorry for lack of a proper emoticon to say &quot;not talking about you.&quot;

peace man

ms</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve R: I was not calling you falsely pious or thinking of you when I wrote the sentence. I see how you made the connection, but that wasn&#8217;t my intention.</p>
<p>Sorry for lack of a proper emoticon to say &#8220;not talking about you.&#8221;</p>
<p>peace man</p>
<p>ms</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nannykim</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/why-mark-driscoll-shouldnt-bug-ya/comment-page-3#comment-490474</link>
		<dc:creator>nannykim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 22:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/?p=3526#comment-490474</guid>
		<description>Thanks Michael,

I think your post was balanced. My son attends Mark&#039;s church and it has been used of God to cause amazing growth and vibrancy in my son.  When he arrived in the Seattle area to work for Microsoft he was far from the Lord...God used the ministry there to get him back into Scripture study, love for the LORD and for His people.

Someone commented that the church was not friendly; but my son has found the opposite to be true...then again my son is out-going. He joined a community group---yes, he had to speak to them twice about it , but they did plug him in to one. 

Anyways, thanks for your balanced approach to Mark. I think any pastor would have problems to one degree or another if the spotlight is placed on him ;-). Everyone falls short at times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Michael,</p>
<p>I think your post was balanced. My son attends Mark&#8217;s church and it has been used of God to cause amazing growth and vibrancy in my son.  When he arrived in the Seattle area to work for Microsoft he was far from the Lord&#8230;God used the ministry there to get him back into Scripture study, love for the LORD and for His people.</p>
<p>Someone commented that the church was not friendly; but my son has found the opposite to be true&#8230;then again my son is out-going. He joined a community group&#8212;yes, he had to speak to them twice about it , but they did plug him in to one. </p>
<p>Anyways, thanks for your balanced approach to Mark. I think any pastor would have problems to one degree or another if the spotlight is placed on him <img src='http://www.internetmonk.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> . Everyone falls short at times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/why-mark-driscoll-shouldnt-bug-ya/comment-page-3#comment-490411</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/?p=3526#comment-490411</guid>
		<description>I nearly thoroughly enjoyed the SoS series he &quot;produced&quot; / taught on.  I don&#039;t care for the shouting at all, whether by him or any other pastor for that matter.  You know it goes too far when he loses his voice. :)

Of course, I also don&#039;t care for any pastor or teacher or whatever that calls us to honor the wives, mothers, etc, but then tears about man, fathers, husbands a month later.  And you guys and gals know exactly what I&#039;m talking about.  Just look at your congregations the 2nd Sunday of May vs. the 3rd Sunday of June.  What does your pastor preach on?  

Sadly, in the same manner, but without losing their voices, as Driscoll.  And yes, I&#039;ve seen this for years, too.

I wouldn&#039;t say I&#039;m a fanboy.  I hated that he got so much PR from his renouncing of &quot;The Shack&quot; despite never having read it.  Of course, I&#039;m learning the same thing about Harry Potter and how much truth and the Larger Story are within that.  Maybe Twilight next?

On that topic, I think he did a fantastic job with the ABC discussion of Satan and the realities of spiritual warfare.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I nearly thoroughly enjoyed the SoS series he &#8220;produced&#8221; / taught on.  I don&#8217;t care for the shouting at all, whether by him or any other pastor for that matter.  You know it goes too far when he loses his voice. <img src='http://www.internetmonk.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Of course, I also don&#8217;t care for any pastor or teacher or whatever that calls us to honor the wives, mothers, etc, but then tears about man, fathers, husbands a month later.  And you guys and gals know exactly what I&#8217;m talking about.  Just look at your congregations the 2nd Sunday of May vs. the 3rd Sunday of June.  What does your pastor preach on?  </p>
<p>Sadly, in the same manner, but without losing their voices, as Driscoll.  And yes, I&#8217;ve seen this for years, too.</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t say I&#8217;m a fanboy.  I hated that he got so much PR from his renouncing of &#8220;The Shack&#8221; despite never having read it.  Of course, I&#8217;m learning the same thing about Harry Potter and how much truth and the Larger Story are within that.  Maybe Twilight next?</p>
<p>On that topic, I think he did a fantastic job with the ABC discussion of Satan and the realities of spiritual warfare.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve R</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/why-mark-driscoll-shouldnt-bug-ya/comment-page-3#comment-490404</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/?p=3526#comment-490404</guid>
		<description>Wasn&#039;t aware that you and Martha had some history; I&#039;ll leave it alone and let you two sort it out.

&gt; For the record, the “humble Christian”
&gt; blogs do not usually impress me with
&gt; humility, but with false 
&gt; piety. 

False piety? *Now* you&#039;re being a jerk. How can you accuse me of being falsely pious when you don&#039;t even know where I&#039;m coming from?

No, I&#039;m not falsely pious.  Believe me, I&#039;ve been been taught humility MANY times in my life.  Trust me buddy, when you raise yourself up on a pedestal, it hurts that much more when God knocks you down.

&gt; I’m not about to become a timid soul.

Humility and timidity are not synonymous.  Jesus was humble, but He didn&#039;t have any qualms overturning the tables at the temple. Humility means realizing that everything you have: knowledge, power, wealth, etc. are gifts from God and not created by you.  I didn&#039;t ask you to be a church lady, I said we were interested in your opinion, and that alienating religions like Archie Bunker isn&#039;t going to help your point.

I like a lot of what you have to say, but I can easily throw away the parts where you snipe at Catholics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wasn&#8217;t aware that you and Martha had some history; I&#8217;ll leave it alone and let you two sort it out.</p>
<p>&gt; For the record, the “humble Christian”<br />
&gt; blogs do not usually impress me with<br />
&gt; humility, but with false<br />
&gt; piety. </p>
<p>False piety? *Now* you&#8217;re being a jerk. How can you accuse me of being falsely pious when you don&#8217;t even know where I&#8217;m coming from?</p>
<p>No, I&#8217;m not falsely pious.  Believe me, I&#8217;ve been been taught humility MANY times in my life.  Trust me buddy, when you raise yourself up on a pedestal, it hurts that much more when God knocks you down.</p>
<p>&gt; I’m not about to become a timid soul.</p>
<p>Humility and timidity are not synonymous.  Jesus was humble, but He didn&#8217;t have any qualms overturning the tables at the temple. Humility means realizing that everything you have: knowledge, power, wealth, etc. are gifts from God and not created by you.  I didn&#8217;t ask you to be a church lady, I said we were interested in your opinion, and that alienating religions like Archie Bunker isn&#8217;t going to help your point.</p>
<p>I like a lot of what you have to say, but I can easily throw away the parts where you snipe at Catholics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iMonk</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/why-mark-driscoll-shouldnt-bug-ya/comment-page-3#comment-490373</link>
		<dc:creator>iMonk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/?p=3526#comment-490373</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Steve R&lt;/b&gt;: I didn&#039;t condescend to Martha earlier. I was answering her in kind, so you are correct I was not making a demonstration of humility.  Martha is not bashful and she posts with plenty of vinegar. She&#039;s well aware that I will answer in kind and she never shrinks from having her say. We acknowledged that discussion via email. It was Martha who brought Driscoll&#039;s Catholicism into the discussion. Please note her quips following my &quot;unhumble&quot; reply. She dishes it out as well as anyone I know, and I respect that.

I may be lacking humility in my answer because I wasn&#039;t trying to be humble. Martha and several other Catholic commenters occasionally trod into evangelical conversations and say their peace. I answer as addressed. And the favor is returned to me when I step into RC territory.

Martha wrote me via email and acknowledged our exchange. We remain friends and we remain very opinionated. That&#039;s good for business and makes good friendships off line.

For the record, the &quot;humble Christian&quot; blogs do not usually impress me with humility, but with false piety. I could name names. So I appreciate an admonition to not be a jerk, but I&#039;m not about to become a timid soul.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Steve R</b>: I didn&#8217;t condescend to Martha earlier. I was answering her in kind, so you are correct I was not making a demonstration of humility.  Martha is not bashful and she posts with plenty of vinegar. She&#8217;s well aware that I will answer in kind and she never shrinks from having her say. We acknowledged that discussion via email. It was Martha who brought Driscoll&#8217;s Catholicism into the discussion. Please note her quips following my &#8220;unhumble&#8221; reply. She dishes it out as well as anyone I know, and I respect that.</p>
<p>I may be lacking humility in my answer because I wasn&#8217;t trying to be humble. Martha and several other Catholic commenters occasionally trod into evangelical conversations and say their peace. I answer as addressed. And the favor is returned to me when I step into RC territory.</p>
<p>Martha wrote me via email and acknowledged our exchange. We remain friends and we remain very opinionated. That&#8217;s good for business and makes good friendships off line.</p>
<p>For the record, the &#8220;humble Christian&#8221; blogs do not usually impress me with humility, but with false piety. I could name names. So I appreciate an admonition to not be a jerk, but I&#8217;m not about to become a timid soul.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve R</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/why-mark-driscoll-shouldnt-bug-ya/comment-page-3#comment-490371</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/?p=3526#comment-490371</guid>
		<description>&gt; It’s clear to me that whatever version of this
&gt; you’ve heard on the Catholic side, you’re far more &gt; interested in using it to ...
---
&gt; Good thing Mark abandoned His Catholic upbringing...

Monk - the undertones in your and a lot of your readers&#039; responses are coming across as a little patronizing to Catholics. Let me remind you that we are *knowingly* reading a blog written by a Southern Baptist, so please respond with some humility-- realizing that we&#039;re interested in your opinion. We all are here because we love Jesus and we&#039;re looking for your insight.  I&#039;m not personally offended, but I do feel like you were a little condescending to Martha earlier, and I&#039;m not even sure if she caught on to it.

In any case, your blog actually turned me on to Driscoll, and I watched one of his sermons this Sunday-- the one about false teachers. I like his style a lot because (1) he comes across as a teacher and not as a condemner, and (2) he is frank in his lessons.  Driscoll comes across as a real human being who is preaching the Word because he has a passion for it, and is trying to share it with the world.

That said, I&#039;d be afraid that in a few years Driscoll&#039;s passion might diminish and that he&#039;d be just going through the rote.  He preaches with so much fervor now that I&#039;d worry he won&#039;t be able to keep it up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; It’s clear to me that whatever version of this<br />
&gt; you’ve heard on the Catholic side, you’re far more &gt; interested in using it to &#8230;<br />
&#8212;<br />
&gt; Good thing Mark abandoned His Catholic upbringing&#8230;</p>
<p>Monk &#8211; the undertones in your and a lot of your readers&#8217; responses are coming across as a little patronizing to Catholics. Let me remind you that we are *knowingly* reading a blog written by a Southern Baptist, so please respond with some humility&#8211; realizing that we&#8217;re interested in your opinion. We all are here because we love Jesus and we&#8217;re looking for your insight.  I&#8217;m not personally offended, but I do feel like you were a little condescending to Martha earlier, and I&#8217;m not even sure if she caught on to it.</p>
<p>In any case, your blog actually turned me on to Driscoll, and I watched one of his sermons this Sunday&#8211; the one about false teachers. I like his style a lot because (1) he comes across as a teacher and not as a condemner, and (2) he is frank in his lessons.  Driscoll comes across as a real human being who is preaching the Word because he has a passion for it, and is trying to share it with the world.</p>
<p>That said, I&#8217;d be afraid that in a few years Driscoll&#8217;s passion might diminish and that he&#8217;d be just going through the rote.  He preaches with so much fervor now that I&#8217;d worry he won&#8217;t be able to keep it up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ScottL</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/why-mark-driscoll-shouldnt-bug-ya/comment-page-3#comment-490097</link>
		<dc:creator>ScottL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 17:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/?p=3526#comment-490097</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Banning Driscoll at Lifeway will do exactly nothing…..except maybe make him more interesting. The man has millions of mp3 and video downloads a month. Lifeway books aren’t actually where those who like his preaching plug into him. This is the way the world works now. Denominational approval is not required. Piper GIVES AWAY his books for Pete’s sake. If the SBC votes that Driscoll is bad, a few people feel better and Driscoll’s stuff sells 5% more than last month.&lt;/i&gt;

This is so very true. I think we all get our stuff from Amazon.com anyways these days. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Banning Driscoll at Lifeway will do exactly nothing…..except maybe make him more interesting. The man has millions of mp3 and video downloads a month. Lifeway books aren’t actually where those who like his preaching plug into him. This is the way the world works now. Denominational approval is not required. Piper GIVES AWAY his books for Pete’s sake. If the SBC votes that Driscoll is bad, a few people feel better and Driscoll’s stuff sells 5% more than last month.</i></p>
<p>This is so very true. I think we all get our stuff from Amazon.com anyways these days. <img src='http://www.internetmonk.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/why-mark-driscoll-shouldnt-bug-ya/comment-page-3#comment-490083</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 16:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/?p=3526#comment-490083</guid>
		<description>You say in towards the beginning of your post that Driscoll is too loose with his speach on sexuality and should change. I wonder if you are fully considering the culture that he is speaking into. sure, you never hear any pastor go where he goes on the topic, but given the age demographics and lifestyle of his church I have to think that he spends more time there because it&#039;s one of the his churches bigger issues. 

It is Seattle, ya know..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You say in towards the beginning of your post that Driscoll is too loose with his speach on sexuality and should change. I wonder if you are fully considering the culture that he is speaking into. sure, you never hear any pastor go where he goes on the topic, but given the age demographics and lifestyle of his church I have to think that he spends more time there because it&#8217;s one of the his churches bigger issues. </p>
<p>It is Seattle, ya know..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
