<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Bible and The Creative Arts: What Is Paul Doing in Galatians 4:21ff?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/the-bible-and-the-creative-arts-what-is-paul-doing-in-galatians-421ff/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/the-bible-and-the-creative-arts-what-is-paul-doing-in-galatians-421ff</link>
	<description>...dispatches from the post-evangelical wilderness</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 12:47:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Headless Unicorn Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/the-bible-and-the-creative-arts-what-is-paul-doing-in-galatians-421ff/comment-page-1#comment-466966</link>
		<dc:creator>Headless Unicorn Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 20:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/?p=3222#comment-466966</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I never realized that Cordwainer Smith was Christian.&lt;/i&gt; -- Anna A

You missed the significance of the Old Strong Religion and the God Nailed High among the Underpeople? 

CS was Episcopalian, carrying on the traditon of good F&amp;SF coming out of Western-rite liturgical church traditions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I never realized that Cordwainer Smith was Christian.</i> &#8212; Anna A</p>
<p>You missed the significance of the Old Strong Religion and the God Nailed High among the Underpeople? </p>
<p>CS was Episcopalian, carrying on the traditon of good F&amp;SF coming out of Western-rite liturgical church traditions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna A</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/the-bible-and-the-creative-arts-what-is-paul-doing-in-galatians-421ff/comment-page-1#comment-465926</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 22:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/?p=3222#comment-465926</guid>
		<description>HUG,

  I never realized that Cordwainer Smith was Christian.  All I know is that he is a very, very good writer with fascinating people and places.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HUG,</p>
<p>  I never realized that Cordwainer Smith was Christian.  All I know is that he is a very, very good writer with fascinating people and places.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Creative Conversation &#124; HonkinDoodle.com</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/the-bible-and-the-creative-arts-what-is-paul-doing-in-galatians-421ff/comment-page-1#comment-465729</link>
		<dc:creator>Creative Conversation &#124; HonkinDoodle.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 13:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/?p=3222#comment-465729</guid>
		<description>[...] Creative Conversation 2009 May 27   tags: creativity, faith, god, internetmonk.com, the bible by Lyf   Hello there! If you are new here, you might want to subscribe to the RSS feed for updates on this topic.Powered by WP Greet BoxPaul I really enjoy the Internet Monk. He always has good ideas and really engages culture, faith and theology in interesting and honest ways. That&#8217;s why I have to share his article here on the creative arts and the Bible! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Creative Conversation 2009 May 27   tags: creativity, faith, god, internetmonk.com, the bible by Lyf   Hello there! If you are new here, you might want to subscribe to the RSS feed for updates on this topic.Powered by WP Greet BoxPaul I really enjoy the Internet Monk. He always has good ideas and really engages culture, faith and theology in interesting and honest ways. That&#8217;s why I have to share his article here on the creative arts and the Bible! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Creative conversation &#124; Stolte Clan</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/the-bible-and-the-creative-arts-what-is-paul-doing-in-galatians-421ff/comment-page-1#comment-465699</link>
		<dc:creator>Creative conversation &#124; Stolte Clan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 13:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/?p=3222#comment-465699</guid>
		<description>[...] Paul I really enjoy the Internet Monk. He always has good ideas and really engages culture, faith and theology in interesting and honest ways. That&#8217;s why I have to share his article here on the creative arts and the Bible! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Paul I really enjoy the Internet Monk. He always has good ideas and really engages culture, faith and theology in interesting and honest ways. That&#8217;s why I have to share his article here on the creative arts and the Bible! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricky H</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/the-bible-and-the-creative-arts-what-is-paul-doing-in-galatians-421ff/comment-page-1#comment-465634</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricky H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 08:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/?p=3222#comment-465634</guid>
		<description>One thing that the good authors (mentioned in these comments) who happened to be Christians had in common was the understanding that, first and foremost, you have to tell a good story -- with believable characters, and interesting plots. The message (if there is one) isn&#039;t going to be heard, if the story&#039;s no good.

Walker Percy and Flannery O&#039;Connor both used fiction to convey deep religious and philosophical truths. But those truths were contained in compelling stories and interesting characters.

Too often &quot;christian&quot; fiction is like some computer animated movies that seem to think eye-popping CGI will somehow compensate for lack of plot or character developement. Too many christians seem to think a &quot;christian&quot; message automatically makes a story good or worthwhile.

On the other hand,... 

Jesus called the outcasts and rejects of society. Should it then be a surprise that some (or much) of what is done by His followers -- often with the best of intentions -- reflects those unsophisticated roots? Some people have simply never been taught the difference between good art and crap.

Still, I don&#039;t find people&#039;s ignorance to be nearly so frustrating as their apathy. Never having been taught is one thing. Not caring is something much worse. 

But what do I know? I love Charles Williams&#039; novels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing that the good authors (mentioned in these comments) who happened to be Christians had in common was the understanding that, first and foremost, you have to tell a good story &#8212; with believable characters, and interesting plots. The message (if there is one) isn&#8217;t going to be heard, if the story&#8217;s no good.</p>
<p>Walker Percy and Flannery O&#8217;Connor both used fiction to convey deep religious and philosophical truths. But those truths were contained in compelling stories and interesting characters.</p>
<p>Too often &#8220;christian&#8221; fiction is like some computer animated movies that seem to think eye-popping CGI will somehow compensate for lack of plot or character developement. Too many christians seem to think a &#8220;christian&#8221; message automatically makes a story good or worthwhile.</p>
<p>On the other hand,&#8230; </p>
<p>Jesus called the outcasts and rejects of society. Should it then be a surprise that some (or much) of what is done by His followers &#8212; often with the best of intentions &#8212; reflects those unsophisticated roots? Some people have simply never been taught the difference between good art and crap.</p>
<p>Still, I don&#8217;t find people&#8217;s ignorance to be nearly so frustrating as their apathy. Never having been taught is one thing. Not caring is something much worse. </p>
<p>But what do I know? I love Charles Williams&#8217; novels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirby L. Wallace</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/the-bible-and-the-creative-arts-what-is-paul-doing-in-galatians-421ff/comment-page-1#comment-465585</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirby L. Wallace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 06:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/?p=3222#comment-465585</guid>
		<description>Paul does not say that HE is speaking allegorically.  He is saying that the Genesis account ITSELF is an allegory.

He is not taking any creative license at all.  But, merely reiterating, or reproducing the allegory, already delivered as allegory.

I think you&#039;d have better luck steering clear of paraphrases, translations and interprative Bible versions and sticking more to the transliterations.  

A stroll through a transliteration text can be guided by the Holy Spirit, for He would be the author of it.  A Translation or Paraphrase is not. It is the results of man&#039;s attempt to translate **meaning** - which is not, ever, man&#039;s job.  It is the specific job of the Holy Spirit working on God&#039;s own words.  Not man&#039;s interpretation of those words.  &quot;To you it is given to understand, so I speak to you plainly.  To them it is not given, so I speak to them in stories.&quot;  (If you will excuse my paraphrase ;-)

If there must need be an &quot;allegoricist&quot;, you know who that should be.  

Hint:  It&#039;s not man.  ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul does not say that HE is speaking allegorically.  He is saying that the Genesis account ITSELF is an allegory.</p>
<p>He is not taking any creative license at all.  But, merely reiterating, or reproducing the allegory, already delivered as allegory.</p>
<p>I think you&#8217;d have better luck steering clear of paraphrases, translations and interprative Bible versions and sticking more to the transliterations.  </p>
<p>A stroll through a transliteration text can be guided by the Holy Spirit, for He would be the author of it.  A Translation or Paraphrase is not. It is the results of man&#8217;s attempt to translate **meaning** &#8211; which is not, ever, man&#8217;s job.  It is the specific job of the Holy Spirit working on God&#8217;s own words.  Not man&#8217;s interpretation of those words.  &#8220;To you it is given to understand, so I speak to you plainly.  To them it is not given, so I speak to them in stories.&#8221;  (If you will excuse my paraphrase <img src='http://www.internetmonk.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>If there must need be an &#8220;allegoricist&#8221;, you know who that should be.  </p>
<p>Hint:  It&#8217;s not man.  <img src='http://www.internetmonk.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fr. Ernesto</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/the-bible-and-the-creative-arts-what-is-paul-doing-in-galatians-421ff/comment-page-1#comment-465486</link>
		<dc:creator>Fr. Ernesto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 01:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/?p=3222#comment-465486</guid>
		<description>I read fantasy and science fiction for relaxation. In the best of the writers, many of them women, I find incredible depth of character development and an ability to communicate their viewpoint in images of such strength that they force you to think about the underlying presuppositions of their work without forcibly leading you there.

C.S. Lewis, J.R.R. Tolkien, George McDonald all had the capability to tell tales that were not overtly Christian yet had imagery of such depth that they clearly communicated a view of the world consonant with what Scripture tells us.

Would that there were more Christian artists today who could write fictional works of such power.

In passing, iMonk, the Early Church Fathers took that passage, among others, to say that allegory is allowed as one of the hermeneutical methods. The argument between the Antiochian and Alexandrian schools was over how far to take the argument.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read fantasy and science fiction for relaxation. In the best of the writers, many of them women, I find incredible depth of character development and an ability to communicate their viewpoint in images of such strength that they force you to think about the underlying presuppositions of their work without forcibly leading you there.</p>
<p>C.S. Lewis, J.R.R. Tolkien, George McDonald all had the capability to tell tales that were not overtly Christian yet had imagery of such depth that they clearly communicated a view of the world consonant with what Scripture tells us.</p>
<p>Would that there were more Christian artists today who could write fictional works of such power.</p>
<p>In passing, iMonk, the Early Church Fathers took that passage, among others, to say that allegory is allowed as one of the hermeneutical methods. The argument between the Antiochian and Alexandrian schools was over how far to take the argument.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenny</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/the-bible-and-the-creative-arts-what-is-paul-doing-in-galatians-421ff/comment-page-1#comment-465385</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 20:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/?p=3222#comment-465385</guid>
		<description>kls - &quot;T.S. Elliot was a Christian for instance, but he didnâ€™t do â€œChristianâ€ art. He did art.&quot;

Yes, this is another wonderful point that seems to be, for the most part, lost these days.  Like many churches are in a self-imposed artistic dark age because we are afraid of &quot;non-Christian&quot; art (a strange phrase, really).  And if we do attempt to be creative, even if it&#039;s in church, it&#039;s often sub-par.  

This reminds me of a point that Fr. Ernesto made  in the comments section a few weeks ago (correct me if I&#039;m wrong here), that the US has a nation full of &#039;people bound by legalism -but without many good works&#039;.  (That was a loose quotation, BTW...another theme of this thread :) )

Andi - I don&#039;t know enough to say, but I would guess those two guys are at different places on the same continuum...but I could be wrong...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kls &#8211; &#8220;T.S. Elliot was a Christian for instance, but he didnâ€™t do â€œChristianâ€ art. He did art.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes, this is another wonderful point that seems to be, for the most part, lost these days.  Like many churches are in a self-imposed artistic dark age because we are afraid of &#8220;non-Christian&#8221; art (a strange phrase, really).  And if we do attempt to be creative, even if it&#8217;s in church, it&#8217;s often sub-par.  </p>
<p>This reminds me of a point that Fr. Ernesto made  in the comments section a few weeks ago (correct me if I&#8217;m wrong here), that the US has a nation full of &#8216;people bound by legalism -but without many good works&#8217;.  (That was a loose quotation, BTW&#8230;another theme of this thread <img src='http://www.internetmonk.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  )</p>
<p>Andi &#8211; I don&#8217;t know enough to say, but I would guess those two guys are at different places on the same continuum&#8230;but I could be wrong&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CJ</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/the-bible-and-the-creative-arts-what-is-paul-doing-in-galatians-421ff/comment-page-1#comment-465383</link>
		<dc:creator>CJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 20:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/?p=3222#comment-465383</guid>
		<description>Ricky H -- I deal with that attitude all the time as an English teacher at a Christian school.  One mother this year was shocked that I use real literature in the classroom:  &quot;Why don&#039;t you just use the Bible to teach story?&quot;  Grrrr -- because the Bible is NOT a textbook.

The late Madeleine L&#039;Engle wrote a lot about the subject of faith and the arts; I recommend &quot;A Circle of Quiet&quot; and &quot;Walking on Water.&quot;  The second one deals exclusively with this topic.  

I&#039;m with Headless Unicorn Guy -- most so-called Christian fiction is actually a gospel tract disguised as a story.  And that is a sad statement considering we were made in the image of a creative God.

&quot;. . . we make in our measure and in our derivative mode, because we are made: and not only made, but made in the image and likeness of a Maker.&quot;
                              -- J.R.R. Tolkien</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ricky H &#8212; I deal with that attitude all the time as an English teacher at a Christian school.  One mother this year was shocked that I use real literature in the classroom:  &#8220;Why don&#8217;t you just use the Bible to teach story?&#8221;  Grrrr &#8212; because the Bible is NOT a textbook.</p>
<p>The late Madeleine L&#8217;Engle wrote a lot about the subject of faith and the arts; I recommend &#8220;A Circle of Quiet&#8221; and &#8220;Walking on Water.&#8221;  The second one deals exclusively with this topic.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m with Headless Unicorn Guy &#8212; most so-called Christian fiction is actually a gospel tract disguised as a story.  And that is a sad statement considering we were made in the image of a creative God.</p>
<p>&#8220;. . . we make in our measure and in our derivative mode, because we are made: and not only made, but made in the image and likeness of a Maker.&#8221;<br />
                              &#8212; J.R.R. Tolkien</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andi</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/the-bible-and-the-creative-arts-what-is-paul-doing-in-galatians-421ff/comment-page-1#comment-465350</link>
		<dc:creator>Andi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 18:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/?p=3222#comment-465350</guid>
		<description>Do you guys think thereâ€™s any distinction between art that reflects faithâ€”or art produced by a believerâ€”and the imaginative application of Scripture? I think thereâ€™s a difference between the guy who says we donâ€™t have the same freedom to creatively interpret the Scripture that Paul did, and the guy who says that you should only read nonfiction in regard to matters of faith. Those seem like completely different issues to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you guys think thereâ€™s any distinction between art that reflects faithâ€”or art produced by a believerâ€”and the imaginative application of Scripture? I think thereâ€™s a difference between the guy who says we donâ€™t have the same freedom to creatively interpret the Scripture that Paul did, and the guy who says that you should only read nonfiction in regard to matters of faith. Those seem like completely different issues to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

