<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Some Thoughts on Spiritual Gifts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/some-thoughts-on-spiritual-gifts/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/some-thoughts-on-spiritual-gifts</link>
	<description>...dispatches from the post-evangelical wilderness</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 12:47:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Faris</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/some-thoughts-on-spiritual-gifts/comment-page-2#comment-381534</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Faris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/?p=2831#comment-381534</guid>
		<description>im,

I realize I&#039;m late to the party here, but have you read Ken Berding&#039;s, &lt;i&gt;What Are Spiritual Gifts?&lt;/i&gt; by chance?  It&#039;s great stuff that sort of brings us back to the basic question, which is sadly quite rarely addressed.  Most of us assume that a spiritual gift is a supernaturally given latent ability, almost like a spiritual super-power (no condescension meant by that phrase, and let&#039;s be honest: that&#039;s basically what we&#039;re saying!).

At &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.christiansincontext.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Christians in Context&lt;/a&gt; we did a series on spiritual gifts where we basically unpacked Berding&#039;s book.  The series includes an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.christiansincontext.org/2009/01/interview-with-ken-berding-about-what.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;interview with Dr. Berding&lt;/a&gt; (which is the best place to start), a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.christiansincontext.org/2009/01/review-of-ken-berdings-what-are.html&quot;review of his book&lt;/a&gt; and a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.christiansincontext.org/2009/01/one-more-on-spiritual-gifts-tying-up.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;follow-up post&lt;/a&gt; to tie up some of the loose ends.

Honestly, after interacting personally with Dr. Berding for some time (he is a Bib. Studies prof. at Biola, where I went for my undergrad degree) and reading his book, I&#039;m pretty convinced that his case is dang near bullet proof and is a great corrective for the church.  I&#039;d be curious for what you&#039;d think.

Thanks for the stimulating post, even if you don&#039;t bother reading our discussion!

Andrew</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>im,</p>
<p>I realize I&#8217;m late to the party here, but have you read Ken Berding&#8217;s, <i>What Are Spiritual Gifts?</i> by chance?  It&#8217;s great stuff that sort of brings us back to the basic question, which is sadly quite rarely addressed.  Most of us assume that a spiritual gift is a supernaturally given latent ability, almost like a spiritual super-power (no condescension meant by that phrase, and let&#8217;s be honest: that&#8217;s basically what we&#8217;re saying!).</p>
<p>At <a href="http://www.christiansincontext.org" rel="nofollow">Christians in Context</a> we did a series on spiritual gifts where we basically unpacked Berding&#8217;s book.  The series includes an <a href="http://www.christiansincontext.org/2009/01/interview-with-ken-berding-about-what.html" rel="nofollow">interview with Dr. Berding</a> (which is the best place to start), a &lt;a href=&#8221;http://www.christiansincontext.org/2009/01/review-of-ken-berdings-what-are.html&#8221;review of his book and a <a href="http://www.christiansincontext.org/2009/01/one-more-on-spiritual-gifts-tying-up.html" rel="nofollow">follow-up post</a> to tie up some of the loose ends.</p>
<p>Honestly, after interacting personally with Dr. Berding for some time (he is a Bib. Studies prof. at Biola, where I went for my undergrad degree) and reading his book, I&#8217;m pretty convinced that his case is dang near bullet proof and is a great corrective for the church.  I&#8217;d be curious for what you&#8217;d think.</p>
<p>Thanks for the stimulating post, even if you don&#8217;t bother reading our discussion!</p>
<p>Andrew</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremiah Lawson</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/some-thoughts-on-spiritual-gifts/comment-page-2#comment-379493</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremiah Lawson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 18:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/?p=2831#comment-379493</guid>
		<description>3.5 is the big deal for me.  I have come to believe that too often we incline to the view that spiritual gifts, once given, are with us for life.  I think a careful examination of how the Spirit comes upon people in Scripture would reveal that there are a lot of acts of the Spirit that are one-shot events that aren&#039;t replicated.  At the risk of pointing to the most exceptional case first, the conception of Christ.  No one else in the history of the universe had Mary&#039;s experience.  King Saul had the Spirit come upon him in an unusual way and performed physical feats he never displayed later. 

Setting aside the inevitable debate some would have about whether King Saul was really elect or not my main point is that we can see the Spirit works on an occasional basis in ways that benefit the people of God in particular ways through particular people.  A person may have a gift for discerning spirits at one time and not another yet most teaching on the spiritual gifts presupposes a persistency that I don&#039;t see Scripture being all that clear about.  It seems popular to go with a few sections in epistles rather than also consult the narrative books.  Perhaps our understanding of the gifts would be more balanced if we didn&#039;t zero in on a few sections of Paul and looked at the wider biblical context in which the work of the Spirit is described?

I, too, have noticed most discussion of spiritual gifts finally amounts to a personality inventory/test seminar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>3.5 is the big deal for me.  I have come to believe that too often we incline to the view that spiritual gifts, once given, are with us for life.  I think a careful examination of how the Spirit comes upon people in Scripture would reveal that there are a lot of acts of the Spirit that are one-shot events that aren&#8217;t replicated.  At the risk of pointing to the most exceptional case first, the conception of Christ.  No one else in the history of the universe had Mary&#8217;s experience.  King Saul had the Spirit come upon him in an unusual way and performed physical feats he never displayed later. </p>
<p>Setting aside the inevitable debate some would have about whether King Saul was really elect or not my main point is that we can see the Spirit works on an occasional basis in ways that benefit the people of God in particular ways through particular people.  A person may have a gift for discerning spirits at one time and not another yet most teaching on the spiritual gifts presupposes a persistency that I don&#8217;t see Scripture being all that clear about.  It seems popular to go with a few sections in epistles rather than also consult the narrative books.  Perhaps our understanding of the gifts would be more balanced if we didn&#8217;t zero in on a few sections of Paul and looked at the wider biblical context in which the work of the Spirit is described?</p>
<p>I, too, have noticed most discussion of spiritual gifts finally amounts to a personality inventory/test seminar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Headless Unicorn Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/some-thoughts-on-spiritual-gifts/comment-page-2#comment-378807</link>
		<dc:creator>Headless Unicorn Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 22:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/?p=2831#comment-378807</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;It never fails to disappoint me that religion doesnâ€™t actually make better people of us. How come us Christians are such tools all the time?&lt;/i&gt; -- Pat Lynch

Because &quot;People are people, and the world is full of tricks and twistiness yet undreamed of.&quot; 
-- One of &lt;i&gt;The Whole Earth Catalogs&lt;/i&gt;

&lt;i&gt;â€œFanboysâ€ is the perfect term for such folks. Usually you can recognize them by their self-justifying legalism or the overabundance of Jesus junk they purchase; but when theyâ€™re charismatics, you recognize them by the tongues.&lt;/i&gt; -- K.W.Leslie

And when they&#039;re Catholics, you can recognize them by their Marian obsessions.  And Mary junk along with the Jesus junk.  Makes me wish St Mary WOULD appear to some of her fanboys and slap some sense into them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>It never fails to disappoint me that religion doesnâ€™t actually make better people of us. How come us Christians are such tools all the time?</i> &#8212; Pat Lynch</p>
<p>Because &#8220;People are people, and the world is full of tricks and twistiness yet undreamed of.&#8221;<br />
&#8211; One of <i>The Whole Earth Catalogs</i></p>
<p><i>â€œFanboysâ€ is the perfect term for such folks. Usually you can recognize them by their self-justifying legalism or the overabundance of Jesus junk they purchase; but when theyâ€™re charismatics, you recognize them by the tongues.</i> &#8212; K.W.Leslie</p>
<p>And when they&#8217;re Catholics, you can recognize them by their Marian obsessions.  And Mary junk along with the Jesus junk.  Makes me wish St Mary WOULD appear to some of her fanboys and slap some sense into them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K.W. Leslie</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/some-thoughts-on-spiritual-gifts/comment-page-2#comment-378790</link>
		<dc:creator>K.W. Leslie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 22:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/?p=2831#comment-378790</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Chuck:&lt;/b&gt; Yeah, reading my statement again makes it look like I&#039;m being a snarky critic of some Christiansâ€¦ I was trying to indicate the opposites of faith (unbelief), wisdom (stupidity), and discernment (gullibility). The purpose of these gifts is to counter these &lt;i&gt;practices&lt;/i&gt;. I don&#039;t mean to imply we&#039;re to drive away such people. Came out wrong in my attempt to be brief.

&lt;b&gt;Headless:&lt;/b&gt; When I first encountered charismatics, I agreeâ€”the tongues thing was &lt;i&gt;way&lt;/i&gt; overdone. Still is. He who speaks in tongues edifies himself, (1Co 14:4) so there are a lot of charismatics and pentecostals who do little else. But that&#039;s true of most Christians. It&#039;s human nature to follow Jesus in order to better ourselves, not to love God and our neighbors.

&quot;Fanboys&quot; is the perfect term for such folks. Usually you can recognize them by their self-justifying legalism or the overabundance of Jesus junk they purchase; but when they&#039;re charismatics, you recognize them by the tongues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Chuck:</b> Yeah, reading my statement again makes it look like I&#8217;m being a snarky critic of some Christiansâ€¦ I was trying to indicate the opposites of faith (unbelief), wisdom (stupidity), and discernment (gullibility). The purpose of these gifts is to counter these <i>practices</i>. I don&#8217;t mean to imply we&#8217;re to drive away such people. Came out wrong in my attempt to be brief.</p>
<p><b>Headless:</b> When I first encountered charismatics, I agreeâ€”the tongues thing was <i>way</i> overdone. Still is. He who speaks in tongues edifies himself, (1Co 14:4) so there are a lot of charismatics and pentecostals who do little else. But that&#8217;s true of most Christians. It&#8217;s human nature to follow Jesus in order to better ourselves, not to love God and our neighbors.</p>
<p>&#8220;Fanboys&#8221; is the perfect term for such folks. Usually you can recognize them by their self-justifying legalism or the overabundance of Jesus junk they purchase; but when they&#8217;re charismatics, you recognize them by the tongues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Lynch</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/some-thoughts-on-spiritual-gifts/comment-page-2#comment-378685</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Lynch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/?p=2831#comment-378685</guid>
		<description>&quot;Yeah, Pat. Theyâ€™re called â€œSpiritual Gift Fanboysâ€, with all the drooling fanboy traits of self-indulgence, stupidity, and superiority complexes.&quot;

It never fails to disappoint me that religion doesn&#039;t actually make better people of us. How come us Christians are such tools all the time?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Yeah, Pat. Theyâ€™re called â€œSpiritual Gift Fanboysâ€, with all the drooling fanboy traits of self-indulgence, stupidity, and superiority complexes.&#8221;</p>
<p>It never fails to disappoint me that religion doesn&#8217;t actually make better people of us. How come us Christians are such tools all the time?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Headless Unicorn Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/some-thoughts-on-spiritual-gifts/comment-page-2#comment-378598</link>
		<dc:creator>Headless Unicorn Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/?p=2831#comment-378598</guid>
		<description>Yeah, Pat.  They&#039;re called &quot;Spiritual Gift Fanboys&quot;, with all the drooling fanboy traits of self-indulgence, stupidity, and superiority complexes.

When I first encountered Charismatics, there were all these Spiritual Gifts they claimed:  Speaking in Tongues, Speaking in Tongues, Tongues, Tongues, Tongues, Tongues, Tongues, and Tongues.  

I held out for Wisdom -- the command-and-control over all the others.  Didn&#039;t make me very welcome around Charismatics, but I&#039;d rather have the gift of knowing what to do (and what NOT to do) in an encounter/situation than spend hours scat-singing in something Semitic.

Oh, and &quot;gift of discernment&quot; depends on how you define &quot;discernment&quot;.  If it means being able to immediately size up the truth of a given situation cold, I&#039;m for it.  If it means obsessively looking for Satan and his Whoopee Cushion under every bed (&quot;DEMON! DEMON! DEMON!&quot;), No Way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, Pat.  They&#8217;re called &#8220;Spiritual Gift Fanboys&#8221;, with all the drooling fanboy traits of self-indulgence, stupidity, and superiority complexes.</p>
<p>When I first encountered Charismatics, there were all these Spiritual Gifts they claimed:  Speaking in Tongues, Speaking in Tongues, Tongues, Tongues, Tongues, Tongues, Tongues, and Tongues.  </p>
<p>I held out for Wisdom &#8212; the command-and-control over all the others.  Didn&#8217;t make me very welcome around Charismatics, but I&#8217;d rather have the gift of knowing what to do (and what NOT to do) in an encounter/situation than spend hours scat-singing in something Semitic.</p>
<p>Oh, and &#8220;gift of discernment&#8221; depends on how you define &#8220;discernment&#8221;.  If it means being able to immediately size up the truth of a given situation cold, I&#8217;m for it.  If it means obsessively looking for Satan and his Whoopee Cushion under every bed (&#8220;DEMON! DEMON! DEMON!&#8221;), No Way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Lynch</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/some-thoughts-on-spiritual-gifts/comment-page-1#comment-378524</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Lynch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/?p=2831#comment-378524</guid>
		<description>(Googling the words &quot;spiritual gift&quot; is a hilarious exercise in observing other people&#039;s self-indulgence. Look it up for yourself and tell me this whole thing isn&#039;t just another awkward tangent of a selfish and uncertain American spirituality; see some of the intellectual fruit of this inward-gazing and tell me these people, the authors and consumers of all this spiritual content, are really winners at life. I don&#039;t see it.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Googling the words &#8220;spiritual gift&#8221; is a hilarious exercise in observing other people&#8217;s self-indulgence. Look it up for yourself and tell me this whole thing isn&#8217;t just another awkward tangent of a selfish and uncertain American spirituality; see some of the intellectual fruit of this inward-gazing and tell me these people, the authors and consumers of all this spiritual content, are really winners at life. I don&#8217;t see it.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Lynch</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/some-thoughts-on-spiritual-gifts/comment-page-1#comment-378522</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Lynch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/?p=2831#comment-378522</guid>
		<description>&quot;The clear teaching of 1 Corinthians 12 is that spiritual gifts are anything but average, normal, or ordinary.&quot;

So then why the reports in this thread of churches offer &#039;inventories&#039; that demonstrate assuring everyone that they have SOME kind of spiritual gift?

That&#039;s what I can&#039;t get around: this seeming abuse of the concept and the nomenclature of &quot;Gifts of God&quot; - the admittedly weird and supernatural - and their transformation into a kind of &quot;me too&quot;-spirituality that everybody partakes in somehow. 

We start using words like &#039;wisdom&#039; and &#039;discernment&#039; to apply to people who are neither wise nor particularly discerning, and we end up with a community of people who no longer understand the meanings of the words in real life, but claim special access to spiritual power anyways. As a result, we ALL personally know flakes who claim to be able to discern spirits or speak in tongues and who really love God - since God is Who made them special. I think that&#039;s pretty weak, Corinthians or no. 

What do you think? Am I exercising my gift of discernment or no?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The clear teaching of 1 Corinthians 12 is that spiritual gifts are anything but average, normal, or ordinary.&#8221;</p>
<p>So then why the reports in this thread of churches offer &#8216;inventories&#8217; that demonstrate assuring everyone that they have SOME kind of spiritual gift?</p>
<p>That&#8217;s what I can&#8217;t get around: this seeming abuse of the concept and the nomenclature of &#8220;Gifts of God&#8221; &#8211; the admittedly weird and supernatural &#8211; and their transformation into a kind of &#8220;me too&#8221;-spirituality that everybody partakes in somehow. </p>
<p>We start using words like &#8216;wisdom&#8217; and &#8216;discernment&#8217; to apply to people who are neither wise nor particularly discerning, and we end up with a community of people who no longer understand the meanings of the words in real life, but claim special access to spiritual power anyways. As a result, we ALL personally know flakes who claim to be able to discern spirits or speak in tongues and who really love God &#8211; since God is Who made them special. I think that&#8217;s pretty weak, Corinthians or no. </p>
<p>What do you think? Am I exercising my gift of discernment or no?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry Wallace</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/some-thoughts-on-spiritual-gifts/comment-page-1#comment-378520</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Wallace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/?p=2831#comment-378520</guid>
		<description>Very good.  I think your point 3.5 is especially biblical and helpful.  It prevents people from thinking they aren&#039;t a candidate to do that one particularly distasteful job because they aren&#039;t &quot;gifted&quot; in that area.  The Holy Spirit may most certainly empower me to do what I by nature cannot do (or will not consider doing).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good.  I think your point 3.5 is especially biblical and helpful.  It prevents people from thinking they aren&#8217;t a candidate to do that one particularly distasteful job because they aren&#8217;t &#8220;gifted&#8221; in that area.  The Holy Spirit may most certainly empower me to do what I by nature cannot do (or will not consider doing).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Surfnetter</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/some-thoughts-on-spiritual-gifts/comment-page-1#comment-378285</link>
		<dc:creator>Surfnetter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 07:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/?p=2831#comment-378285</guid>
		<description>K. W. -- &quot;God needs to help us counteract the unbelievers, the stupid, and the gullible.&quot;

Traversing this statement I got a couple of flats and a broken spring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>K. W. &#8212; &#8220;God needs to help us counteract the unbelievers, the stupid, and the gullible.&#8221;</p>
<p>Traversing this statement I got a couple of flats and a broken spring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

