<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sabbatical Journal 1/Peterson Seminar (Conclusion)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/sabbatical-journal-1peterson-seminar-conclusion/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/sabbatical-journal-1peterson-seminar-conclusion</link>
	<description>...dispatches from the post-evangelical wilderness</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 13:41:53 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ken</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/sabbatical-journal-1peterson-seminar-conclusion/comment-page-1#comment-205421</link>
		<dc:creator>ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 23:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/sabbatical-journal-1peterson-seminar-conclusion#comment-205421</guid>
		<description>churches? sabbaticals? pastors?  this is all fabrications of todays religious scene.   in my books no need for organized religion with someone over me, calling the shots.the bible can be read and absorbed without anyones plethora of their particular interpretations. they spew forth anything from the pulpit, wrap a few scriptures around it and think that&#039;s it.  2 people form a church and god can be in their midst. fabrications  for wasting money such as sabbaticals ,ensure the demise of interest towards the church nowadays. incessant blithering of imposed  teachings of tithing to the masses also promotes disinterest. people are not standing for religion and it&#039;s  traditions that are eons old and the #&#039;s show it at the lobby.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>churches? sabbaticals? pastors?  this is all fabrications of todays religious scene.   in my books no need for organized religion with someone over me, calling the shots.the bible can be read and absorbed without anyones plethora of their particular interpretations. they spew forth anything from the pulpit, wrap a few scriptures around it and think that&#8217;s it.  2 people form a church and god can be in their midst. fabrications  for wasting money such as sabbaticals ,ensure the demise of interest towards the church nowadays. incessant blithering of imposed  teachings of tithing to the masses also promotes disinterest. people are not standing for religion and it&#8217;s  traditions that are eons old and the #&#8217;s show it at the lobby.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Ritchie</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/sabbatical-journal-1peterson-seminar-conclusion/comment-page-1#comment-203104</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Ritchie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 22:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/sabbatical-journal-1peterson-seminar-conclusion#comment-203104</guid>
		<description>Peterson may be right about the Septuagint as a loose translation.  But someone may make the case that he&#039;s wrong, too.  I believe that our oldest Septuagint manuscripts are in most cases much older than our oldest Hebrew manuscripts.  From the little I know of the textual history, cases can be made for either being more reliable.  And perhaps one manuscript may win for one part of the Old Testament and another may win for the other part.  Even if someone can make a case that the Hebrew manuscripts are always better, that case must be made before we decide that the Septuagint translation is loose.  Perhaps explanatory notes added to one Hebrew text were copied into the actual text of the next generation of copies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peterson may be right about the Septuagint as a loose translation.  But someone may make the case that he&#8217;s wrong, too.  I believe that our oldest Septuagint manuscripts are in most cases much older than our oldest Hebrew manuscripts.  From the little I know of the textual history, cases can be made for either being more reliable.  And perhaps one manuscript may win for one part of the Old Testament and another may win for the other part.  Even if someone can make a case that the Hebrew manuscripts are always better, that case must be made before we decide that the Septuagint translation is loose.  Perhaps explanatory notes added to one Hebrew text were copied into the actual text of the next generation of copies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Spencer</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/sabbatical-journal-1peterson-seminar-conclusion/comment-page-1#comment-203098</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Spencer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 21:37:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/sabbatical-journal-1peterson-seminar-conclusion#comment-203098</guid>
		<description>Ontological Church= That church in its being

Functional Church= what the church does- actions, programs, buildings, numbers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ontological Church= That church in its being</p>
<p>Functional Church= what the church does- actions, programs, buildings, numbers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/sabbatical-journal-1peterson-seminar-conclusion/comment-page-1#comment-203094</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 21:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/sabbatical-journal-1peterson-seminar-conclusion#comment-203094</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s the &quot;functional church&quot;?  Is it the same thing as the universal church?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s the &#8220;functional church&#8221;?  Is it the same thing as the universal church?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenny</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/sabbatical-journal-1peterson-seminar-conclusion/comment-page-1#comment-203033</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 13:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/sabbatical-journal-1peterson-seminar-conclusion#comment-203033</guid>
		<description>I absolutely love and needed to read that quote on prayer today. Thanks for sharing about what you learned.  Any word on when book #4 in the current Peterson series will be released?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I absolutely love and needed to read that quote on prayer today. Thanks for sharing about what you learned.  Any word on when book #4 in the current Peterson series will be released?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/sabbatical-journal-1peterson-seminar-conclusion/comment-page-1#comment-202984</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 07:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/sabbatical-journal-1peterson-seminar-conclusion#comment-202984</guid>
		<description>Thanks for relaying your experiences on sabbatical.  Concerning Peterson&#039;s comments on the Septuagint, in my advanced Greek class at Catholic University, almost every day (as well as on our mid-term and final) our professor would give us a verse in Hebrew and had us translate it into Greek to see how we do compared with the translators of the LXX.  Granted the Hebrew text the translators of the Septuagint had to work with may have been slightly different, I am not sure if the differences are accounted for by an intentionally loose translation or because the translators, being fallible human beings, got it wrong on occasion.  

As for his other comments, Peterson has a lot to say about the pitfalls of the modern evangelical church.  Many in the ministry would do well to listen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for relaying your experiences on sabbatical.  Concerning Peterson&#8217;s comments on the Septuagint, in my advanced Greek class at Catholic University, almost every day (as well as on our mid-term and final) our professor would give us a verse in Hebrew and had us translate it into Greek to see how we do compared with the translators of the LXX.  Granted the Hebrew text the translators of the Septuagint had to work with may have been slightly different, I am not sure if the differences are accounted for by an intentionally loose translation or because the translators, being fallible human beings, got it wrong on occasion.  </p>
<p>As for his other comments, Peterson has a lot to say about the pitfalls of the modern evangelical church.  Many in the ministry would do well to listen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/sabbatical-journal-1peterson-seminar-conclusion/comment-page-1#comment-202948</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 04:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/sabbatical-journal-1peterson-seminar-conclusion#comment-202948</guid>
		<description>Great points on the church!  It seems like the overall sense is to &quot;cease striving&quot; in terms of marketing the church to the world.  Our sinning should be bold, for it explains our hope.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great points on the church!  It seems like the overall sense is to &#8220;cease striving&#8221; in terms of marketing the church to the world.  Our sinning should be bold, for it explains our hope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
