<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Riffs: 05:13:09: Scot Mcknight on the Individualized &#8220;gospel&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/riffs-051309-scot-mcknight-on-the-individualized-gospel/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/riffs-051309-scot-mcknight-on-the-individualized-gospel</link>
	<description>...dispatches from the post-evangelical wilderness</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 11:36:22 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lance Athanasius</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/riffs-051309-scot-mcknight-on-the-individualized-gospel/comment-page-2#comment-461640</link>
		<dc:creator>Lance Athanasius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 00:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/?p=3182#comment-461640</guid>
		<description>I think this post connects with some earlier posts about discipline and discipleship. Roger Williams started the Rhode Island colony based upon the individual deciding for himself what type of church leadership one should be under. There was a sense of oppression. Luther felt the same oppression, as did Wycliff, Jon Hus, Athanasius, and so many others. The reason that sola scriptora is so important is because it is possible and likely that men who are not believers are able to get power in the church. I don&#039;t have an answer other than to say it is war. Love your brother in the foxhole you are in, and know who the enemy is. Love and Truth side by side.
Jesus did not say it would be easy, so stay in touch with headquarters as often as possible. (that means prayer by the way, not Rome or Constantinople).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this post connects with some earlier posts about discipline and discipleship. Roger Williams started the Rhode Island colony based upon the individual deciding for himself what type of church leadership one should be under. There was a sense of oppression. Luther felt the same oppression, as did Wycliff, Jon Hus, Athanasius, and so many others. The reason that sola scriptora is so important is because it is possible and likely that men who are not believers are able to get power in the church. I don&#8217;t have an answer other than to say it is war. Love your brother in the foxhole you are in, and know who the enemy is. Love and Truth side by side.<br />
Jesus did not say it would be easy, so stay in touch with headquarters as often as possible. (that means prayer by the way, not Rome or Constantinople).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MAJ Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/riffs-051309-scot-mcknight-on-the-individualized-gospel/comment-page-2#comment-461466</link>
		<dc:creator>MAJ Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 16:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/?p=3182#comment-461466</guid>
		<description>David, you hit that nail square.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, you hit that nail square.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/riffs-051309-scot-mcknight-on-the-individualized-gospel/comment-page-2#comment-460791</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 16:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/?p=3182#comment-460791</guid>
		<description>It seems obvious the problem is NOT the Gospel but the  culture people are bringing into the church.
Is it so difficult to admit that there are many elements of American culture which are worth losing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems obvious the problem is NOT the Gospel but the  culture people are bringing into the church.<br />
Is it so difficult to admit that there are many elements of American culture which are worth losing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MAJ Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/riffs-051309-scot-mcknight-on-the-individualized-gospel/comment-page-2#comment-456543</link>
		<dc:creator>MAJ Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 20:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/?p=3182#comment-456543</guid>
		<description>Last post Should read &quot;an authoritative body is NOT a cure-all&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last post Should read &#8220;an authoritative body is NOT a cure-all&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MAJ Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/riffs-051309-scot-mcknight-on-the-individualized-gospel/comment-page-2#comment-456541</link>
		<dc:creator>MAJ Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 20:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/?p=3182#comment-456541</guid>
		<description>Some clarification is in order: I do not disagree that an authoritative body is a cure-all.  iMonk is correct in stating that there is enough in Catholicism to let it become an individualistic pursuit.  

Prior to Vat II, it wasn&#039;t uncommon for those assisting at Mass to pray other devotions such as the Rosary apart from the Liturgy, as the priest and ministers prayed the Mass.  However, it was always expected that the faithful unite their prayers to those of the priest.  What occurred in practice varied, ranging from those who followed along in hand missals to gentlemen who read the Sunday paper.  But the problem, in orthodox Catholic thinking, wasn&#039;t poor intent but poor catechesis, or at least lack of uniform good catechesis.  

That uniform and correct catechesis wasn&#039;t accomplished--and has yet to, in this poster&#039;s understanding--isn&#039;t a defect of institutional structures, as when said structures are properly functioning, they should be capable of serving that function.  (Example of it working (or at least at work): the uniform vocal opposition by 70+ US RC Bishops to Obama&#039;s being awarded a PhD in Law by UND this Sunday)  On the other hand, an objective assessment of unstructured religious bodies would, in my humble opinion, show a natural tendency toward doctrinal entropy, as everyone is his own authority regarding biblical interpretation.  

In light of this, I don&#039;t believe the Lord intended for us to be left without an earthly head.  We can argue until the cows come home about rocks, stones, and pebbles, Greek and Aramaic, feeding sheep and feeding lambs, but it&#039;s all academic when there&#039;s no unified, universal organization, however it&#039;s organized and led or how strong or loose the ties, that can be the honest broker that calls BS when something goes rotten in Denmark.

Yeah, I know, go ahead and say it: the &quot;Catholic&quot; is suggesting we all bow and kiss the Pope&#039;s ring, and submit to his authority.  That&#039;s not what I&#039;m saying to my fellow posters, although it would be a perfect world, IMHO, if that were to happen.  Of course I&#039;m not deluded to think that&#039;s soon to happen.  What I&#039;m saying to all here is we need to on some level, speak with one voice (“Una Voce”) whenever and wherever we can.  We&#039;re surrounded by a veritable cacophony of bad teaching throughout the Christian milieu, independent of disagreements between denominations we already deal with, across the spectrum, from the EV to the RCC to even the Orthodox.  I&#039;m talking about stuff that all have always believed.  

The problem in doing this seems to be the fact that there is so much doctrinal diversity, that it compounds the problem in an almost logarithmic manner in dealing with any given issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some clarification is in order: I do not disagree that an authoritative body is a cure-all.  iMonk is correct in stating that there is enough in Catholicism to let it become an individualistic pursuit.  </p>
<p>Prior to Vat II, it wasn&#8217;t uncommon for those assisting at Mass to pray other devotions such as the Rosary apart from the Liturgy, as the priest and ministers prayed the Mass.  However, it was always expected that the faithful unite their prayers to those of the priest.  What occurred in practice varied, ranging from those who followed along in hand missals to gentlemen who read the Sunday paper.  But the problem, in orthodox Catholic thinking, wasn&#8217;t poor intent but poor catechesis, or at least lack of uniform good catechesis.  </p>
<p>That uniform and correct catechesis wasn&#8217;t accomplished&#8211;and has yet to, in this poster&#8217;s understanding&#8211;isn&#8217;t a defect of institutional structures, as when said structures are properly functioning, they should be capable of serving that function.  (Example of it working (or at least at work): the uniform vocal opposition by 70+ US RC Bishops to Obama&#8217;s being awarded a PhD in Law by UND this Sunday)  On the other hand, an objective assessment of unstructured religious bodies would, in my humble opinion, show a natural tendency toward doctrinal entropy, as everyone is his own authority regarding biblical interpretation.  </p>
<p>In light of this, I don&#8217;t believe the Lord intended for us to be left without an earthly head.  We can argue until the cows come home about rocks, stones, and pebbles, Greek and Aramaic, feeding sheep and feeding lambs, but it&#8217;s all academic when there&#8217;s no unified, universal organization, however it&#8217;s organized and led or how strong or loose the ties, that can be the honest broker that calls BS when something goes rotten in Denmark.</p>
<p>Yeah, I know, go ahead and say it: the &#8220;Catholic&#8221; is suggesting we all bow and kiss the Pope&#8217;s ring, and submit to his authority.  That&#8217;s not what I&#8217;m saying to my fellow posters, although it would be a perfect world, IMHO, if that were to happen.  Of course I&#8217;m not deluded to think that&#8217;s soon to happen.  What I&#8217;m saying to all here is we need to on some level, speak with one voice (“Una Voce”) whenever and wherever we can.  We&#8217;re surrounded by a veritable cacophony of bad teaching throughout the Christian milieu, independent of disagreements between denominations we already deal with, across the spectrum, from the EV to the RCC to even the Orthodox.  I&#8217;m talking about stuff that all have always believed.  </p>
<p>The problem in doing this seems to be the fact that there is so much doctrinal diversity, that it compounds the problem in an almost logarithmic manner in dealing with any given issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MAJ Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/riffs-051309-scot-mcknight-on-the-individualized-gospel/comment-page-2#comment-456193</link>
		<dc:creator>MAJ Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 12:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/?p=3182#comment-456193</guid>
		<description>WRT the topic at hand, I submit humbly that the problem, though certainly not exclusive to Evangelicalism, is certainly going to remain a big problem in Evangelicalism, and to a degree in mainline Protestantism due to the very LACK of authoritative bodies in EV that exist in greater or lesser degrees in the RCC, Ortho, Lutheran, Anglican, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WRT the topic at hand, I submit humbly that the problem, though certainly not exclusive to Evangelicalism, is certainly going to remain a big problem in Evangelicalism, and to a degree in mainline Protestantism due to the very LACK of authoritative bodies in EV that exist in greater or lesser degrees in the RCC, Ortho, Lutheran, Anglican, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iMonk</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/riffs-051309-scot-mcknight-on-the-individualized-gospel/comment-page-2#comment-455646</link>
		<dc:creator>iMonk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 23:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/?p=3182#comment-455646</guid>
		<description>OK....we&#039;re at another one of those impasses that makes me regret having comments.

I do not provide the opportunity to comment here in order to make it impossible to discuss the topic at hand.

The topic, as addressed by Scott and myself is clear. If someone wants to challenge the whole premise, wonderful. Scot&#039;s blog is right around the corner :-)

We aren&#039;t going to launder all the stupid things done by churches. We aren&#039;t going to make Paul equal to Jesus. We aren&#039;t going to decide that the community question is meaningless because without the scriptures- produced by the church- we don&#039;t have a discussion.

I&#039;m shutting down comments for a while. It&#039;s quite unfortunate that this kind of discussion has to be subject to blog comment anarchy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK&#8230;.we&#8217;re at another one of those impasses that makes me regret having comments.</p>
<p>I do not provide the opportunity to comment here in order to make it impossible to discuss the topic at hand.</p>
<p>The topic, as addressed by Scott and myself is clear. If someone wants to challenge the whole premise, wonderful. Scot&#8217;s blog is right around the corner <img src='http://www.internetmonk.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>We aren&#8217;t going to launder all the stupid things done by churches. We aren&#8217;t going to make Paul equal to Jesus. We aren&#8217;t going to decide that the community question is meaningless because without the scriptures- produced by the church- we don&#8217;t have a discussion.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m shutting down comments for a while. It&#8217;s quite unfortunate that this kind of discussion has to be subject to blog comment anarchy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/riffs-051309-scot-mcknight-on-the-individualized-gospel/comment-page-2#comment-455641</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 23:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/?p=3182#comment-455641</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m simply repeating the gospel as I&#039;ve heard it over and over again down here in the Bible Belt: salvation by faith alone. We&#039;re all sinners, etc. etc. 

(Except for gay people. Even faith ain&#039;t enough to save them, seems like. They also must be celibate.)

(Re: works: Scott is doing an excellent job exploring James over on his blog).

Is it not universal practice to place the words of Paul on the same level as the words of Christ? Then we finesse that minor point by invoking the Holy Spirit. 

Paul even gets more space than Jesus -- and who questions that?  I have friends who attend a Bible-based mega-church who won&#039;t even speak to my pastor because she&#039;s a woman. They shun her, based on scripture. Where&#039;s the Christian community there? 

Sure, church is a work. What else is it? Going to church is an action.  Is attending the Bible church I mentioned above a work? 

Frankly, I felt like stirring things up a bit and injecting reality into the violent agreement that yes, community is good. 

Reality is that anyone can stand firmly on  scripture with the belief that faith in Jesus is a get-out-of-jail-free card. 

Do I agree? Nope. But there is more scripture against me than for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m simply repeating the gospel as I&#8217;ve heard it over and over again down here in the Bible Belt: salvation by faith alone. We&#8217;re all sinners, etc. etc. </p>
<p>(Except for gay people. Even faith ain&#8217;t enough to save them, seems like. They also must be celibate.)</p>
<p>(Re: works: Scott is doing an excellent job exploring James over on his blog).</p>
<p>Is it not universal practice to place the words of Paul on the same level as the words of Christ? Then we finesse that minor point by invoking the Holy Spirit. </p>
<p>Paul even gets more space than Jesus &#8212; and who questions that?  I have friends who attend a Bible-based mega-church who won&#8217;t even speak to my pastor because she&#8217;s a woman. They shun her, based on scripture. Where&#8217;s the Christian community there? </p>
<p>Sure, church is a work. What else is it? Going to church is an action.  Is attending the Bible church I mentioned above a work? </p>
<p>Frankly, I felt like stirring things up a bit and injecting reality into the violent agreement that yes, community is good. </p>
<p>Reality is that anyone can stand firmly on  scripture with the belief that faith in Jesus is a get-out-of-jail-free card. </p>
<p>Do I agree? Nope. But there is more scripture against me than for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/riffs-051309-scot-mcknight-on-the-individualized-gospel/comment-page-2#comment-455639</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 23:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/?p=3182#comment-455639</guid>
		<description>..SORRY if i offended you imonk...i apologize..im not jerking anyones chain here..my view of God may not be what it should be but until HE shows me different i must press on in Faith. sincerely, mike logue</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>..SORRY if i offended you imonk&#8230;i apologize..im not jerking anyones chain here..my view of God may not be what it should be but until HE shows me different i must press on in Faith. sincerely, mike logue</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Herring</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/riffs-051309-scot-mcknight-on-the-individualized-gospel/comment-page-2#comment-455627</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Herring</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 22:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/?p=3182#comment-455627</guid>
		<description>Dear Sir,

http://two10five.blogspot.com/2009/04/who-is-church-pt4-or-what-place-does.html

Sincerely, and with much gratitude for your work,
Lee</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Sir,</p>
<p><a href="http://two10five.blogspot.com/2009/04/who-is-church-pt4-or-what-place-does.html" rel="nofollow">http://two10five.blogspot.com/2009/04/who-is-church-pt4-or-what-place-does.html</a></p>
<p>Sincerely, and with much gratitude for your work,<br />
Lee</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
