This line of reasoning also seems to drive the argument for Biblical inerrancy. We grow very uncomfortable with God using an apparently fallible means.

1. Do you think that attitudes of “veneration and unquestioned submission to leaders” are related to the use of the Bible as a, to use your term, “magic book?”

2. If the disciples (including the apostles-to-be) are so clearly portrayed in Mark’s Gospel as (heh) disappointing, why do so many people interpret them as being perfect leaders and conduits of God’s Spirit after Jesus’s resurrection (or after Pentecost, alternatively)?

an interesting article “How a religious CULTure is Created” see: http://www.batteredsheep.com/pdf/think04.pdf

MM

When I left as a “find out”, as opposed to a “washed out”, or a “burned out” or a “kicked out” (see http://nextreformation.com/html/articles/recover.htm) the only thing the group admitted to was their exclusivity, while ignoring all the other abuses practiced liberally in the name of “spiritual” zeal. To date, most of the leaders have not apologized, and especially not on blogospere nor via email nor via letter.

Yes, it is refreshing that Mark Driscoll has the guts to admit his error and repent publicly. Having experienced “spiritual abuse”, I say a hearty “Amen” to your post. I now fellowship at a Baptist church where the congregation is made up of individuals from a variety of backgrounds (CRC, Lutheran, Brethren, etc..), the pastors are accountable to the elders, and, that which most take for granted, I appreciate that much more because of my history.

There is a warning for each of us to not be like the “foolish Galatians” who gave up their liberty in Christ to “follow another gospel”.

Regards,
MM

Exactly. You encounter it every day when you enter the blogosphere. So let Paul speak to them: “We are fools for Christ, but you are so wise in Christ! We are weak, but you are strong! You are honored, we are dishonored!” (1 Cor. 4:10). And one other thing: Whose example would you prefer to follow?