<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Niki Made Her Choice and, Apparently, So Did We</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/niki-made-her-choice-and-apparently-so-did-we/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/niki-made-her-choice-and-apparently-so-did-we</link>
	<description>...dispatches from the post-evangelical wilderness</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 09:14:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Headless Unicorn Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/niki-made-her-choice-and-apparently-so-did-we/comment-page-1#comment-516286</link>
		<dc:creator>Headless Unicorn Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 18:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/?p=4657#comment-516286</guid>
		<description>Well, since we turned our backs completely on The Future around Y2K, Alt-Hist is one of the up-and-coming fashions in SF.  Forward Into The Past!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, since we turned our backs completely on The Future around Y2K, Alt-Hist is one of the up-and-coming fashions in SF.  Forward Into The Past!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Headless Unicorn Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/niki-made-her-choice-and-apparently-so-did-we/comment-page-1#comment-516285</link>
		<dc:creator>Headless Unicorn Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 18:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/?p=4657#comment-516285</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;â€œThe agent of the burning is God, through His creating the black in the cotton and the disconnection of its parts, and it is God who made the cotton burn and made it ashes either through the intermediation of angels or without intermediation. For fire is a dead body which has no action, and what is the proof that it is the agent? Indeed, the philosophers have no other proof than the observation of the occurrence of the burning, when there is contact with fire, but observation proves only a simultaneity, not a causation, and, in reality, there is no other cause but God.â€&lt;/i&gt; -- Mohammed abu-Hamid al-Ghazali

Woo.  He actually said flat-out that Cause &amp; Effect do not exist.  That &quot;God Willed my fist to snap forward into your face, then God Willed your nose to bleed and hurt.  No Connection Whatsoever.&quot;  Utter Predestination.

I&#039;ve heard historians place the start of Islamic stagnation and decline to when al-Ghazali&#039;s theology became dominant in Islam, after the trauma of the Mongol Incursions.  (Unconfirmed:  al-Ghazali was patronized and his theology enforced by a Caliph who had just usurped the position and was looking desperately to justify his coup as Divine Right.)

At al-Ghazali&#039;s time, Islamic medicine was the most advanced in the world.  Nowadays &quot;Islamic Medicine&quot; means something more like &quot;Recite the Koran over the patient while beating him with rods to drive out the Jinn possessing his belly.&quot;  Imagine how that would have worked with my perforated diverticulitis (turned peritoniitis) three years ago, with failure explained as &quot;Inshal&#039;lah...&quot; 

Utter Predestination means never having to take responsibility for anything.  I keep saying that &quot;al_Ghazali set Islam down that path 800 years ago.  Look where it got them.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>â€œThe agent of the burning is God, through His creating the black in the cotton and the disconnection of its parts, and it is God who made the cotton burn and made it ashes either through the intermediation of angels or without intermediation. For fire is a dead body which has no action, and what is the proof that it is the agent? Indeed, the philosophers have no other proof than the observation of the occurrence of the burning, when there is contact with fire, but observation proves only a simultaneity, not a causation, and, in reality, there is no other cause but God.â€</i> &#8212; Mohammed abu-Hamid al-Ghazali</p>
<p>Woo.  He actually said flat-out that Cause &amp; Effect do not exist.  That &#8220;God Willed my fist to snap forward into your face, then God Willed your nose to bleed and hurt.  No Connection Whatsoever.&#8221;  Utter Predestination.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve heard historians place the start of Islamic stagnation and decline to when al-Ghazali&#8217;s theology became dominant in Islam, after the trauma of the Mongol Incursions.  (Unconfirmed:  al-Ghazali was patronized and his theology enforced by a Caliph who had just usurped the position and was looking desperately to justify his coup as Divine Right.)</p>
<p>At al-Ghazali&#8217;s time, Islamic medicine was the most advanced in the world.  Nowadays &#8220;Islamic Medicine&#8221; means something more like &#8220;Recite the Koran over the patient while beating him with rods to drive out the Jinn possessing his belly.&#8221;  Imagine how that would have worked with my perforated diverticulitis (turned peritoniitis) three years ago, with failure explained as &#8220;Inshal&#8217;lah&#8230;&#8221; </p>
<p>Utter Predestination means never having to take responsibility for anything.  I keep saying that &#8220;al_Ghazali set Islam down that path 800 years ago.  Look where it got them.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Lynch</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/niki-made-her-choice-and-apparently-so-did-we/comment-page-2#comment-514746</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Lynch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/?p=4657#comment-514746</guid>
		<description>&quot;Ironically, the hypothetical was proposed (I think) to spur a more inclusive view, but Iâ€™ve always known that it comes down to this: Either youâ€™re a Young Earther, an empirical atheist, or (most common now) a â€œBig Closeterâ€. The last seems the most disingenuous to me.&quot;

Humble, missionary Christianity, buried alive in scholasticism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Ironically, the hypothetical was proposed (I think) to spur a more inclusive view, but Iâ€™ve always known that it comes down to this: Either youâ€™re a Young Earther, an empirical atheist, or (most common now) a â€œBig Closeterâ€. The last seems the most disingenuous to me.&#8221;</p>
<p>Humble, missionary Christianity, buried alive in scholasticism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Lynch</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/niki-made-her-choice-and-apparently-so-did-we/comment-page-2#comment-514690</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Lynch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 04:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/?p=4657#comment-514690</guid>
		<description>Alternate ideas aren&#039;t always good ideas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alternate ideas aren&#8217;t always good ideas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gene Feagan</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/niki-made-her-choice-and-apparently-so-did-we/comment-page-2#comment-514650</link>
		<dc:creator>Gene Feagan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 13:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/?p=4657#comment-514650</guid>
		<description>Please see The GENESIS FLOOD. This book began my understanding of alternate ideas to evolution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please see The GENESIS FLOOD. This book began my understanding of alternate ideas to evolution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ProdigalSarah</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/niki-made-her-choice-and-apparently-so-did-we/comment-page-2#comment-514529</link>
		<dc:creator>ProdigalSarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 14:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/?p=4657#comment-514529</guid>
		<description>Emily,
You story leaves me feeling sad and frustrated. I would say the first thing to question is any church that discourages questioning. Prayerful questioning about anything may very well lead to strengthened faith.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Emily,<br />
You story leaves me feeling sad and frustrated. I would say the first thing to question is any church that discourages questioning. Prayerful questioning about anything may very well lead to strengthened faith.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jody+</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/niki-made-her-choice-and-apparently-so-did-we/comment-page-2#comment-514370</link>
		<dc:creator>Jody+</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 06:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/?p=4657#comment-514370</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;...until we were leaving and we happened to walk past this fairly large anti-evolution poster board. And thinking about it more as I drove home I got rather angry, because it was quite possible that this brand of anti-scientific Christianity is all that many of these students have heard.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

To be fair, and speaking as a more conservative member of the clergy in a mainline/oldline tradition, I can say that this is as much a function of the failure of the old mainline as anything else.  I&#039;m convinced that a faithful mainline tradition is the natural home of many now-secular americans, and that it would balance against some of the elements exemplified in this post.  Unfortunately, faithfulness is sometimes very hard to find.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8230;until we were leaving and we happened to walk past this fairly large anti-evolution poster board. And thinking about it more as I drove home I got rather angry, because it was quite possible that this brand of anti-scientific Christianity is all that many of these students have heard.</p></blockquote>
<p>To be fair, and speaking as a more conservative member of the clergy in a mainline/oldline tradition, I can say that this is as much a function of the failure of the old mainline as anything else.  I&#8217;m convinced that a faithful mainline tradition is the natural home of many now-secular americans, and that it would balance against some of the elements exemplified in this post.  Unfortunately, faithfulness is sometimes very hard to find.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K.W. Leslie</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/niki-made-her-choice-and-apparently-so-did-we/comment-page-1#comment-514295</link>
		<dc:creator>K.W. Leslie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 19:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/?p=4657#comment-514295</guid>
		<description>Yeah, that&#039;s technically true. The Second Law requires a closed system in order to function. However, the usual versions of the Second Law never explicitly state this, &#039;cause the Second Law is a statement about the overall entropy in the universe, not the specific entropy in a smaller system like a planet or a lifeform.

It&#039;s taking the rules of a universal scale and applying them to a specific situationâ€”kinda how, from the opposite perspective, the New Agers take quantum theory and apply it to how we should perceive the universe. It&#039;s taking science out of context.

Yes, I compared Christians to New Agers. Pseudoscience is pseudoscience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, that&#8217;s technically true. The Second Law requires a closed system in order to function. However, the usual versions of the Second Law never explicitly state this, &#8217;cause the Second Law is a statement about the overall entropy in the universe, not the specific entropy in a smaller system like a planet or a lifeform.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s taking the rules of a universal scale and applying them to a specific situationâ€”kinda how, from the opposite perspective, the New Agers take quantum theory and apply it to how we should perceive the universe. It&#8217;s taking science out of context.</p>
<p>Yes, I compared Christians to New Agers. Pseudoscience is pseudoscience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: emily</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/niki-made-her-choice-and-apparently-so-did-we/comment-page-2#comment-514228</link>
		<dc:creator>emily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 14:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/?p=4657#comment-514228</guid>
		<description>This couldn&#039;t have been more timely for me!  I was recently having a conversation with one of the exchange students from China, it was on their National Day and so we were in the library watching the parade and just talking about random things, which kept going back to many cultural differences and such. We got onto the subject of religion and how it affects their beliefs and actions. This kid wears a red string bracelet on his right arm (for Buddhism. left arm is Kabbalah) and I asked him about it and he simply told me that his mother is Buddhist and gave it to him to wear, but that he &quot;believes in science&quot;. 

I mentioned that I didn&#039;t think science and Buddhism were incompatable, but something else came up in the parade and we changed the subject (and then got into a conversation about how the only things that American students learn about China are bad... hahaha)  But later that week we all met at a church for their traditional culture night (for international students and their host parents, my roomate&#039;s host parents couldn&#039;t make it so I went with her instead) which was a great time until we were leaving and we happened to walk past this fairly large anti-evolution poster board. And thinking about it more as I drove home I got rather angry, because it was quite possible that this brand of anti-scientific Christianity is all that many of these students have heard.  

I have a neighbor who is a hard-core Young Earth Creationist (I&#039;m pretty sure she has purchased their entire gift-shop worth of books and movies from the Creation Museum) and in the past I&#039;ve simply tried to overlook her insistance in YEC, especially when she berated me when I was still on the fence between YEC and &quot;the evil other of evolution&quot; (I have since moved towards that &quot;evil other&quot;... not quite 100% accepting, but I do outright reject YEC) (and then proceeded to have a series of questions/answers with her daughter to &quot;show&quot; me what the &quot;right&quot; answers look like).  But more and more recently I&#039;ve been thinking about what effect this sort of behavior can have on people outside of the Church.  If we can&#039;t even give them a place to ask questions, let alone to not agree with a scientific reading of Genesis, why does anyone think they would come flocking to us? I realize that many Christians are comforted by the thought that the Bible really does have &quot;all the answers&quot;... but I think that is just not true at all! It has some answers, yes. And important answers to important questions, but it does not have all the answers and I think some people really need to just get used to it. :/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This couldn&#8217;t have been more timely for me!  I was recently having a conversation with one of the exchange students from China, it was on their National Day and so we were in the library watching the parade and just talking about random things, which kept going back to many cultural differences and such. We got onto the subject of religion and how it affects their beliefs and actions. This kid wears a red string bracelet on his right arm (for Buddhism. left arm is Kabbalah) and I asked him about it and he simply told me that his mother is Buddhist and gave it to him to wear, but that he &#8220;believes in science&#8221;. </p>
<p>I mentioned that I didn&#8217;t think science and Buddhism were incompatable, but something else came up in the parade and we changed the subject (and then got into a conversation about how the only things that American students learn about China are bad&#8230; hahaha)  But later that week we all met at a church for their traditional culture night (for international students and their host parents, my roomate&#8217;s host parents couldn&#8217;t make it so I went with her instead) which was a great time until we were leaving and we happened to walk past this fairly large anti-evolution poster board. And thinking about it more as I drove home I got rather angry, because it was quite possible that this brand of anti-scientific Christianity is all that many of these students have heard.  </p>
<p>I have a neighbor who is a hard-core Young Earth Creationist (I&#8217;m pretty sure she has purchased their entire gift-shop worth of books and movies from the Creation Museum) and in the past I&#8217;ve simply tried to overlook her insistance in YEC, especially when she berated me when I was still on the fence between YEC and &#8220;the evil other of evolution&#8221; (I have since moved towards that &#8220;evil other&#8221;&#8230; not quite 100% accepting, but I do outright reject YEC) (and then proceeded to have a series of questions/answers with her daughter to &#8220;show&#8221; me what the &#8220;right&#8221; answers look like).  But more and more recently I&#8217;ve been thinking about what effect this sort of behavior can have on people outside of the Church.  If we can&#8217;t even give them a place to ask questions, let alone to not agree with a scientific reading of Genesis, why does anyone think they would come flocking to us? I realize that many Christians are comforted by the thought that the Bible really does have &#8220;all the answers&#8221;&#8230; but I think that is just not true at all! It has some answers, yes. And important answers to important questions, but it does not have all the answers and I think some people really need to just get used to it. :/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erp</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/niki-made-her-choice-and-apparently-so-did-we/comment-page-1#comment-514178</link>
		<dc:creator>Erp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 06:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/?p=4657#comment-514178</guid>
		<description>Actually life does not violate the second law of thermodynamics because the second law requires a closed system and the earth is not a closed system (energy, a lot of it, comes from the sun).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually life does not violate the second law of thermodynamics because the second law requires a closed system and the earth is not a closed system (energy, a lot of it, comes from the sun).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

