<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Books For Sale!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/more-books-for-sale/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/more-books-for-sale</link>
	<description>...dispatches from the post-evangelical wilderness</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 12:11:07 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/more-books-for-sale/comment-page-1#comment-191867</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 13:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/more-books-for-sale#comment-191867</guid>
		<description>At some point I would really enjoy seeing a post on what non-reference books you think deserve to be considered keepers, ones you go back and back to, as opposed to those that you later wonder why you spent the money instead of borrowing them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At some point I would really enjoy seeing a post on what non-reference books you think deserve to be considered keepers, ones you go back and back to, as opposed to those that you later wonder why you spent the money instead of borrowing them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
