<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Love Is An Orientation: Reader Reviews Part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/love-is-an-orientation-reader-reviews-part-2/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/love-is-an-orientation-reader-reviews-part-2</link>
	<description>...dispatches from the post-evangelical wilderness</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 00:42:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/love-is-an-orientation-reader-reviews-part-2/comment-page-1#comment-510804</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 00:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/?p=4438#comment-510804</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your honesty, Todd.  I&#039;ll have to admit I had you pegged as coming from a different perspective, but now I see your perspective more clearly.   Though we may disagree on certain points, there is much value in looking at new or different perspectives, and I needed that!  Thanks, IMonk, for a blog that promotes discussion on such a variety of issues with a variety of perspectives!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your honesty, Todd.  I&#8217;ll have to admit I had you pegged as coming from a different perspective, but now I see your perspective more clearly.   Though we may disagree on certain points, there is much value in looking at new or different perspectives, and I needed that!  Thanks, IMonk, for a blog that promotes discussion on such a variety of issues with a variety of perspectives!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donalbain</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/love-is-an-orientation-reader-reviews-part-2/comment-page-1#comment-510766</link>
		<dc:creator>Donalbain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 08:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/?p=4438#comment-510766</guid>
		<description>Sorry, but I happen to believe that the likes of Fred Phelps are more useful to the cause of equality than the nicey nice, civil people. Fred Phelps makes it harder for people to afgree with the premise that homosexuals should be denied basic human rights. He is a whackjob, and he makes the evil people who agree with him look like whackjobs. When you have a bigot in a suit, they are more dangerous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, but I happen to believe that the likes of Fred Phelps are more useful to the cause of equality than the nicey nice, civil people. Fred Phelps makes it harder for people to afgree with the premise that homosexuals should be denied basic human rights. He is a whackjob, and he makes the evil people who agree with him look like whackjobs. When you have a bigot in a suit, they are more dangerous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich W</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/love-is-an-orientation-reader-reviews-part-2/comment-page-1#comment-510745</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 23:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/?p=4438#comment-510745</guid>
		<description>BB:   You haven&#039;t heard a church teach that someone with homosexual feelings is going to hell, because often the issue is ignored (from the pulpit) and such assumptions are generally accepted.  

I greatly respect Marin and appreciate the effort imonk has put forth in an attempt to ensure the success of Marin&#039;s work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BB:   You haven&#8217;t heard a church teach that someone with homosexual feelings is going to hell, because often the issue is ignored (from the pulpit) and such assumptions are generally accepted.  </p>
<p>I greatly respect Marin and appreciate the effort imonk has put forth in an attempt to ensure the success of Marin&#8217;s work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/love-is-an-orientation-reader-reviews-part-2/comment-page-1#comment-510730</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 19:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/?p=4438#comment-510730</guid>
		<description>As I said, I&#039;d prefer evangelicals take Marin&#039;s attitude than Fred Phelp&#039;s (i.e., I&#039;m not putting all evangelicals in the same bin).  However, it&#039;s rather sad that a message of basic human decency towards gay folks is considered so &quot;courageous&quot; and &quot;radical&quot; among evangelicals.  

If Marin can reduce rampant evangelical homophobia, good for him (and us gays), but his portrayal of gays in his book (which I have read) was deeply irritating to me.  I did not see myself and the many LGBT folks I know and love--the majority of whom had some version of a Christian upbringing--in the people he portrayed.  He systematically refused to portray any gays who were happy, well adjusted and secular.  Instead, he fell back into the old missionary trope of broken, sad gays who really are longing to be just like him: Christian.  Perhaps he had to portray gays this way for his (straight) evangelical audience to have sympathy for them, but to me, it belied a certain arrogance that comes with refusing to believe that others could lead hold radically different beliefs than yours and lead very different lives that are nonetheless happy, fulfilled, ethical, and deeply meaningful.  Perhaps my basic beef is with exclusivist Christian soteriology and the attitude it breeds among some Christians about the possibility of happiness and fulfillment among non-Christian people.  

Lest I be the needlessly aggressive gay atheist interloper, thank you iMonk for hosting a civil discussion and working to fight evangelical homophobia.  I do hope that my secular gay voice may offer a different perspective as well, and I apologize if I breached the bounds of civility in my above comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I said, I&#8217;d prefer evangelicals take Marin&#8217;s attitude than Fred Phelp&#8217;s (i.e., I&#8217;m not putting all evangelicals in the same bin).  However, it&#8217;s rather sad that a message of basic human decency towards gay folks is considered so &#8220;courageous&#8221; and &#8220;radical&#8221; among evangelicals.  </p>
<p>If Marin can reduce rampant evangelical homophobia, good for him (and us gays), but his portrayal of gays in his book (which I have read) was deeply irritating to me.  I did not see myself and the many LGBT folks I know and love&#8211;the majority of whom had some version of a Christian upbringing&#8211;in the people he portrayed.  He systematically refused to portray any gays who were happy, well adjusted and secular.  Instead, he fell back into the old missionary trope of broken, sad gays who really are longing to be just like him: Christian.  Perhaps he had to portray gays this way for his (straight) evangelical audience to have sympathy for them, but to me, it belied a certain arrogance that comes with refusing to believe that others could lead hold radically different beliefs than yours and lead very different lives that are nonetheless happy, fulfilled, ethical, and deeply meaningful.  Perhaps my basic beef is with exclusivist Christian soteriology and the attitude it breeds among some Christians about the possibility of happiness and fulfillment among non-Christian people.  </p>
<p>Lest I be the needlessly aggressive gay atheist interloper, thank you iMonk for hosting a civil discussion and working to fight evangelical homophobia.  I do hope that my secular gay voice may offer a different perspective as well, and I apologize if I breached the bounds of civility in my above comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iMonk</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/love-is-an-orientation-reader-reviews-part-2/comment-page-1#comment-510728</link>
		<dc:creator>iMonk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 18:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/?p=4438#comment-510728</guid>
		<description>Thanks Todd. We&#039;re going to keep pushing the book here, and my advice to you would be this: Maris is doing more good for your community among evangelicals than anyone you can find. You may disagree- and you might want to read the book first btw- but there&#039;s going to be a lot less stupidity and hateful rhetoric because Marin has the spine to stand up and do what he does.

If you want to be put everyone who disagrees with gay marriage in the same bin, go ahead. I get death threats.... fairly regularly, but I&#039;ve decided that&#039;s the nut case fringe. I&#039;m assuming that the people who come to this blog and say &quot;Thanks for being different and promoting a civil discussion&quot; mean it sincerely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Todd. We&#8217;re going to keep pushing the book here, and my advice to you would be this: Maris is doing more good for your community among evangelicals than anyone you can find. You may disagree- and you might want to read the book first btw- but there&#8217;s going to be a lot less stupidity and hateful rhetoric because Marin has the spine to stand up and do what he does.</p>
<p>If you want to be put everyone who disagrees with gay marriage in the same bin, go ahead. I get death threats&#8230;. fairly regularly, but I&#8217;ve decided that&#8217;s the nut case fringe. I&#8217;m assuming that the people who come to this blog and say &#8220;Thanks for being different and promoting a civil discussion&#8221; mean it sincerely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/love-is-an-orientation-reader-reviews-part-2/comment-page-1#comment-510725</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 18:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/?p=4438#comment-510725</guid>
		<description>Also, I do disagree with the premise of the book.  

I&#039;ll take the love (which has been shockingly absent from Christians toward gay folks for about two millennia), but please keep the Christ-pointing to yourselves.  You lack any credibility to do among LGBT folks and best I can tell, your good news for LGBT folks is to be sexless and single, which most of us will take a pass on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, I do disagree with the premise of the book.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll take the love (which has been shockingly absent from Christians toward gay folks for about two millennia), but please keep the Christ-pointing to yourselves.  You lack any credibility to do among LGBT folks and best I can tell, your good news for LGBT folks is to be sexless and single, which most of us will take a pass on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/love-is-an-orientation-reader-reviews-part-2/comment-page-1#comment-510722</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 17:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/?p=4438#comment-510722</guid>
		<description>I would not have named it after myself, unless I&#039;d already accomplished something in my life.  The Nelson Mandela Foundation is fine, but when you&#039;re a random 20 something who hasn&#039;t really accomplished anything in life, naming a foundation after yourself reeks of shameless self promotion and arrogance.  I&#039;ve heard humility is a virtue among you Christian folks....

If it&#039;s Marin or Fred Phelps, I&#039;ll gladly take Marin, but I mostly wish that Christians would leave LGBT folks alone.  Also, Marin consistently refuses to say whether or not he thinks it&#039;s okay for gay folks to be sexual with each other.  He lets Christians think that he&#039;s trying to &quot;witness&quot; to gay folks and get them to convert (and presumably stop being gay and/or having gay sex).  He lets gays think that he is the rare evangelical who actually approves of homosexuality (though he refuses to say this).

Hence, I accuse Marin of being a two-faced self-promoter, telling everyone what they want to hear.  But there&#039;s so much anxiety in the evangelical world about growing acceptance of gay folks that there&#039;s surely plenty of money and fame to be had in his racket.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would not have named it after myself, unless I&#8217;d already accomplished something in my life.  The Nelson Mandela Foundation is fine, but when you&#8217;re a random 20 something who hasn&#8217;t really accomplished anything in life, naming a foundation after yourself reeks of shameless self promotion and arrogance.  I&#8217;ve heard humility is a virtue among you Christian folks&#8230;.</p>
<p>If it&#8217;s Marin or Fred Phelps, I&#8217;ll gladly take Marin, but I mostly wish that Christians would leave LGBT folks alone.  Also, Marin consistently refuses to say whether or not he thinks it&#8217;s okay for gay folks to be sexual with each other.  He lets Christians think that he&#8217;s trying to &#8220;witness&#8221; to gay folks and get them to convert (and presumably stop being gay and/or having gay sex).  He lets gays think that he is the rare evangelical who actually approves of homosexuality (though he refuses to say this).</p>
<p>Hence, I accuse Marin of being a two-faced self-promoter, telling everyone what they want to hear.  But there&#8217;s so much anxiety in the evangelical world about growing acceptance of gay folks that there&#8217;s surely plenty of money and fame to be had in his racket.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ali</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/love-is-an-orientation-reader-reviews-part-2/comment-page-1#comment-510693</link>
		<dc:creator>Ali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 01:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/?p=4438#comment-510693</guid>
		<description>&quot;How many Christians would still be in church if being a Christian meant THEY had to be celibate and to never have a partner to share life with?&quot;

Glenda, I&#039;m one who believes that homosexuality is wrong, but I think that question you ask above is an excellent one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;How many Christians would still be in church if being a Christian meant THEY had to be celibate and to never have a partner to share life with?&#8221;</p>
<p>Glenda, I&#8217;m one who believes that homosexuality is wrong, but I think that question you ask above is an excellent one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenda -- a lesbian</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/love-is-an-orientation-reader-reviews-part-2/comment-page-1#comment-510673</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenda -- a lesbian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 18:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/?p=4438#comment-510673</guid>
		<description>Michael -- my computer acted a  bit strange so I&#039;m not sure this actually was sent to you yesterday.  If you&#039;re not posting it for a reason, that&#039;s okay.  :-)

I&#039;m grateful for Michael bringing this book to my attention.  I&#039;ve read it, recommended it to others, and gotten my local library to purchase a copy.

Marin never compromises that he believes homosexual behavior to be wrong, but his focus is always on compassion.  I&#039;m not hurt when people tell me that they believe homosexuality to be wrong.  But I am hurt when people who have barely studied the issue assume that the answers are obvious and that of course I must know that what I&#039;m doing is wrong.  I don&#039;t know; I&#039;m searching.  As with many issues, the more I study it the more questions that arise. 

It hurts when I&#039;m reduced to a sin.  I&#039;m &quot;that lesbian.&quot;  The church doesn&#039;t seem nearly as concerned about my lack of love for others or about the doubts that plague my relationship with Jesus.  Why is the most important thing about me my sexuality?

It hurts when people tell me all I have to do is to decide not to be gay any more.  I have no more idea of how to do that than to fly.  How many Christians would still be in church if being a Christian meant THEY had to be celibate and to never have a partner to share life with?

It hurts when I come to church struggling, but there&#039;s no one safe enough for me to talk with.

Marin doesn&#039;t ask for compromise -- only compassion.  Trust that God is big enough to teach us and change us in his timing and his way.  Please provide safe relationships where gays can explore and discover what God is about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael &#8212; my computer acted a  bit strange so I&#8217;m not sure this actually was sent to you yesterday.  If you&#8217;re not posting it for a reason, that&#8217;s okay.  <img src='http://www.internetmonk.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I&#8217;m grateful for Michael bringing this book to my attention.  I&#8217;ve read it, recommended it to others, and gotten my local library to purchase a copy.</p>
<p>Marin never compromises that he believes homosexual behavior to be wrong, but his focus is always on compassion.  I&#8217;m not hurt when people tell me that they believe homosexuality to be wrong.  But I am hurt when people who have barely studied the issue assume that the answers are obvious and that of course I must know that what I&#8217;m doing is wrong.  I don&#8217;t know; I&#8217;m searching.  As with many issues, the more I study it the more questions that arise. </p>
<p>It hurts when I&#8217;m reduced to a sin.  I&#8217;m &#8220;that lesbian.&#8221;  The church doesn&#8217;t seem nearly as concerned about my lack of love for others or about the doubts that plague my relationship with Jesus.  Why is the most important thing about me my sexuality?</p>
<p>It hurts when people tell me all I have to do is to decide not to be gay any more.  I have no more idea of how to do that than to fly.  How many Christians would still be in church if being a Christian meant THEY had to be celibate and to never have a partner to share life with?</p>
<p>It hurts when I come to church struggling, but there&#8217;s no one safe enough for me to talk with.</p>
<p>Marin doesn&#8217;t ask for compromise &#8212; only compassion.  Trust that God is big enough to teach us and change us in his timing and his way.  Please provide safe relationships where gays can explore and discover what God is about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greg r</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/love-is-an-orientation-reader-reviews-part-2/comment-page-1#comment-510670</link>
		<dc:creator>greg r</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 18:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/?p=4438#comment-510670</guid>
		<description>There are LOTS of issues, and sub-issues here, but one of them,and a very big one, is : 

what does the gospel of Jesus Christ say about homosexuality, and by extension, to homosexuals ?  Yes, I know they are much more than a collection of sexual preference and expression.....the question still stands (for me at least)

not making this a sermonette, here, but how we minister with and to the GLBT community will be shaped by how we answer this question, among others. 

the shed blood upon all of us broken, lost coins
Greg R</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are LOTS of issues, and sub-issues here, but one of them,and a very big one, is : </p>
<p>what does the gospel of Jesus Christ say about homosexuality, and by extension, to homosexuals ?  Yes, I know they are much more than a collection of sexual preference and expression&#8230;..the question still stands (for me at least)</p>
<p>not making this a sermonette, here, but how we minister with and to the GLBT community will be shaped by how we answer this question, among others. </p>
<p>the shed blood upon all of us broken, lost coins<br />
Greg R</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
