<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Judging Scripture</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/judging-scripture/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/judging-scripture</link>
	<description>...dispatches from the post-evangelical wilderness</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 13:41:53 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Phillip Winn</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/judging-scripture/comment-page-1#comment-4984</link>
		<dc:creator>Phillip Winn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2005 16:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/index.php/archives/judging-scripture#comment-4984</guid>
		<description>Berean, I&#039;m pretty sure it doesn&#039;t make sense to judge modern documents by sub-cultural standards of civility either!

The Bible offends everybody -- that&#039;s the wonderful thing about it! To the strong it says, you&#039;re weak. To the proud it say, what you&#039;re most proud of is worthless. To the self-righteous it says that only Jesus is righteous. To the vain it says that beauty passes. To those that claim that we please God by doing &quot;more&quot; it says that we please God only by doing less. And so on.

In this case, it offends those who feel good by attacking the word choices of others. The Bible tells it like it is, all right, and that offends some American Evangelicals who want their Bible to be a tame rulebook.

Thanks for the comment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Berean, I&#8217;m pretty sure it doesn&#8217;t make sense to judge modern documents by sub-cultural standards of civility either!</p>
<p>The Bible offends everybody &#8212; that&#8217;s the wonderful thing about it! To the strong it says, you&#8217;re weak. To the proud it say, what you&#8217;re most proud of is worthless. To the self-righteous it says that only Jesus is righteous. To the vain it says that beauty passes. To those that claim that we please God by doing &#8220;more&#8221; it says that we please God only by doing less. And so on.</p>
<p>In this case, it offends those who feel good by attacking the word choices of others. The Bible tells it like it is, all right, and that offends some American Evangelicals who want their Bible to be a tame rulebook.</p>
<p>Thanks for the comment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Berean</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/judging-scripture/comment-page-1#comment-4980</link>
		<dc:creator>Berean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2005 03:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/index.php/archives/judging-scripture#comment-4980</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure it makes much sense to judge an ancient document by modern standards of civility. One of the things I like about the Bible is that is tells it like it is, and the human heroes have flaws.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure it makes much sense to judge an ancient document by modern standards of civility. One of the things I like about the Bible is that is tells it like it is, and the human heroes have flaws.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/judging-scripture/comment-page-1#comment-4976</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 19:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/index.php/archives/judging-scripture#comment-4976</guid>
		<description>I like Paul&#039;s comment in Galatians that if the legalists think it&#039;s important as a demonstration of faith to be circumsized, why don&#039;t they simply cut off their entire johnson (I&#039;m paraphrasing, of course).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Paul&#8217;s comment in Galatians that if the legalists think it&#8217;s important as a demonstration of faith to be circumsized, why don&#8217;t they simply cut off their entire johnson (I&#8217;m paraphrasing, of course).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phillip Winn</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/judging-scripture/comment-page-1#comment-4975</link>
		<dc:creator>Phillip Winn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 19:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/index.php/archives/judging-scripture#comment-4975</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t know iMonk was going to post this over here, or I might have stuck in a bit more explanation and context. :-)

I certainly am not advocating the use of filthy speech, especially not for shock value. I see this essay as a corrective reminder to those who adopt arbitrary standards of vocabulary and then treat them as if they are God-ordained. Word are generally just words; it is the ideas we communicate that are most important. Jim Herriot can use &quot;the S-word&quot; matter-of-factly in his delightful books about his life as a vet without offending any reasonable person, while most people would be very offended if I said &quot;You&#039;re full of poop!&quot; to them.

The Bible, as it happens, has a little of both. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t know iMonk was going to post this over here, or I might have stuck in a bit more explanation and context. <img src='http://www.internetmonk.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I certainly am not advocating the use of filthy speech, especially not for shock value. I see this essay as a corrective reminder to those who adopt arbitrary standards of vocabulary and then treat them as if they are God-ordained. Word are generally just words; it is the ideas we communicate that are most important. Jim Herriot can use &#8220;the S-word&#8221; matter-of-factly in his delightful books about his life as a vet without offending any reasonable person, while most people would be very offended if I said &#8220;You&#8217;re full of poop!&#8221; to them.</p>
<p>The Bible, as it happens, has a little of both. <img src='http://www.internetmonk.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tomsmedley</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/judging-scripture/comment-page-1#comment-4973</link>
		<dc:creator>tomsmedley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 15:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/index.php/archives/judging-scripture#comment-4973</guid>
		<description>Hear! Hear!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hear! Hear!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bluejean</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/judging-scripture/comment-page-1#comment-4971</link>
		<dc:creator>bluejean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 06:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/index.php/archives/judging-scripture#comment-4971</guid>
		<description>Wow.  I&#039;ve been often told I was tactless, although correct on issues.  I think I need to just print this out and carry it with me!  I don&#039;t swear, I just use plain language and that bothers people at tiems... wow.  Great read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.  I&#8217;ve been often told I was tactless, although correct on issues.  I think I need to just print this out and carry it with me!  I don&#8217;t swear, I just use plain language and that bothers people at tiems&#8230; wow.  Great read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Beers</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/judging-scripture/comment-page-1#comment-4968</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Beers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 02:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/index.php/archives/judging-scripture#comment-4968</guid>
		<description>Malachi 2:3 amazes me at the depth of God&#039;s rage at the priests who profaned His Name.
Behold, I will rebuke your offspring, and spread dung on your faces, the dung of your offerings, and you shall be taken away with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.gnpcb.org/esv/search/?go=Go&amp;q=Malachi+2%3A3" class="bibleref" title="ESV Malachi 2:3">Malachi 2:3</a> amazes me at the depth of God&#8217;s rage at the priests who profaned His Name.<br />
Behold, I will rebuke your offspring, and spread dung on your faces, the dung of your offerings, and you shall be taken away with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
