<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iMonk 101: Previous Posts on Missional Churches + Bob Hyatt + Ed Stetzer on Culture</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/imonk-101-previous-posts-on-missional-churches-bob-hyatt/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/imonk-101-previous-posts-on-missional-churches-bob-hyatt</link>
	<description>...dispatches from the post-evangelical wilderness</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 12:47:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: centuri0n</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/imonk-101-previous-posts-on-missional-churches-bob-hyatt/comment-page-1#comment-31004</link>
		<dc:creator>centuri0n</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 22:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/imonk-101-previous-posts-on-missional-churches-bob-hyatt#comment-31004</guid>
		<description>An interesting thing, which you have again overlooked, in the Stetzer blog article you linked was this:

&lt;i&gt;Contextualizing does not mean that your church needs to look like Northpoint (Atlanta) or Mosaic (LA). It may mean something very different, and a culturally relevant church in your community may look very different from culturally relevant churches in other communities. &lt;b&gt;Yet, many of us miss that&lt;/b&gt;. Why? Because too many leaders pastor their churches in their heads &lt;b&gt;and not in their communities&lt;/b&gt;. But the truth is, if you can&#039;t pastor the people God has given you (not the ones He&#039;s given Andy Stanley or Erwin McManus), then you don&#039;t love them. John Knox said, &quot;Give me Scotland or I die.&quot; He had a passion for the people of Scotland. We need to have the same passion for the people where we are, and to love them and their culture.&lt;/i&gt;

Why say that bold part, iMonk?  And why then ignore it?

Isn&#039;t Dr. Stetzer saying frankly that &quot;missional&quot; does not mean &quot;just like X&quot; but &quot;in the way the locals will receive it&quot;?

So in that, why do you chide anyone for making that &lt;i&gt;exact same point&lt;/i&gt; about what Dr. Stetzer says &quot;many of us miss that&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interesting thing, which you have again overlooked, in the Stetzer blog article you linked was this:</p>
<p><i>Contextualizing does not mean that your church needs to look like Northpoint (Atlanta) or Mosaic (LA). It may mean something very different, and a culturally relevant church in your community may look very different from culturally relevant churches in other communities. <b>Yet, many of us miss that</b>. Why? Because too many leaders pastor their churches in their heads <b>and not in their communities</b>. But the truth is, if you can&#8217;t pastor the people God has given you (not the ones He&#8217;s given Andy Stanley or Erwin McManus), then you don&#8217;t love them. John Knox said, &#8220;Give me Scotland or I die.&#8221; He had a passion for the people of Scotland. We need to have the same passion for the people where we are, and to love them and their culture.</i></p>
<p>Why say that bold part, iMonk?  And why then ignore it?</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t Dr. Stetzer saying frankly that &#8220;missional&#8221; does not mean &#8220;just like X&#8221; but &#8220;in the way the locals will receive it&#8221;?</p>
<p>So in that, why do you chide anyone for making that <i>exact same point</i> about what Dr. Stetzer says &#8220;many of us miss that&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

