<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Father Smith Instructs Jackson On Indulgences: A Reformation Day Consideration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/father-smith-instructs-jackson-on-indulgences-a-reformation-day-consideration/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/father-smith-instructs-jackson-on-indulgences-a-reformation-day-consideration</link>
	<description>...dispatches from the post-evangelical wilderness</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 14:43:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Headless Unicorn Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/father-smith-instructs-jackson-on-indulgences-a-reformation-day-consideration/comment-page-5#comment-313020</link>
		<dc:creator>Headless Unicorn Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 21:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/father-smith-instructs-jackson-on-indulgences-a-reformation-day-consideration#comment-313020</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;â€¦then theyâ€™ll turn around and say, â€œBy the way, if you are not doing A, B, or C, youâ€™re probably not elect.â€

Is this not just works snuck in through a back door?&lt;/i&gt; -- Confused

Or the latest in &quot;spiritual one-upmanship&quot;.

i.e. &quot;Proof of election/salvation is whatever I do that YOU don&#039;t.&quot;  And &quot;The Unpardonable Sin is whatver YOU do that I don&#039;t.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>â€¦then theyâ€™ll turn around and say, â€œBy the way, if you are not doing A, B, or C, youâ€™re probably not elect.â€</p>
<p>Is this not just works snuck in through a back door?</i> &#8212; Confused</p>
<p>Or the latest in &#8220;spiritual one-upmanship&#8221;.</p>
<p>i.e. &#8220;Proof of election/salvation is whatever I do that YOU don&#8217;t.&#8221;  And &#8220;The Unpardonable Sin is whatver YOU do that I don&#8217;t.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew N. Petersen</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/father-smith-instructs-jackson-on-indulgences-a-reformation-day-consideration/comment-page-5#comment-312972</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew N. Petersen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 17:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/father-smith-instructs-jackson-on-indulgences-a-reformation-day-consideration#comment-312972</guid>
		<description>I wrote a relatively long discussion of Indulgences working from the Prodigal Son &lt;a href=&quot;http://colinclout12.blogspot.com/2008/11/indulgences.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wrote a relatively long discussion of Indulgences working from the Prodigal Son <a href="http://colinclout12.blogspot.com/2008/11/indulgences.html" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Confused</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/father-smith-instructs-jackson-on-indulgences-a-reformation-day-consideration/comment-page-5#comment-312730</link>
		<dc:creator>Confused</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 23:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/father-smith-instructs-jackson-on-indulgences-a-reformation-day-consideration#comment-312730</guid>
		<description>Imonk, I apologize.  I am sorry that I was accusatory toward you.  I should stop posting anywhere until I get my head a little more straight.  I will bow out and appreciate any prayers you can offer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imonk, I apologize.  I am sorry that I was accusatory toward you.  I should stop posting anywhere until I get my head a little more straight.  I will bow out and appreciate any prayers you can offer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iMonk</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/father-smith-instructs-jackson-on-indulgences-a-reformation-day-consideration/comment-page-4#comment-312710</link>
		<dc:creator>iMonk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 22:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/father-smith-instructs-jackson-on-indulgences-a-reformation-day-consideration#comment-312710</guid>
		<description>I believe I was responding to you, but where did you gey &quot;flippant?&quot; I was literally going out the door when I typed it, and I still don&#039;t have time (literally) to have a huge debate on the reformed tendency to introspection as a work.

But I said I agree it CAN be a problem, and I cited the best work I know of on the issue.

But for the record, if the reformed can sometimes turn faith into works by a wrong emphasis, Catholicism rejects the radical implications of the fall and tells us that salvation is synergistic. And that sends me to hell immediately. It&#039;s either Luther&#039;s doctrine- ramped up a bit- or universalism if I am to have any hope at all.

peace

MS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe I was responding to you, but where did you gey &#8220;flippant?&#8221; I was literally going out the door when I typed it, and I still don&#8217;t have time (literally) to have a huge debate on the reformed tendency to introspection as a work.</p>
<p>But I said I agree it CAN be a problem, and I cited the best work I know of on the issue.</p>
<p>But for the record, if the reformed can sometimes turn faith into works by a wrong emphasis, Catholicism rejects the radical implications of the fall and tells us that salvation is synergistic. And that sends me to hell immediately. It&#8217;s either Luther&#8217;s doctrine- ramped up a bit- or universalism if I am to have any hope at all.</p>
<p>peace</p>
<p>MS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Confused</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/father-smith-instructs-jackson-on-indulgences-a-reformation-day-consideration/comment-page-4#comment-312623</link>
		<dc:creator>Confused</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 13:21:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/father-smith-instructs-jackson-on-indulgences-a-reformation-day-consideration#comment-312623</guid>
		<description>iMonk,

who are you responding to in that last comment?  If it&#039;s to me, then what I expressed wasn&#039;t a flippant attempt to sidetrack the discussion, but rather something I&#039;m really struggling with.  People like A.W. Pink leave me convinced that EVERYONE is going to Hell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>iMonk,</p>
<p>who are you responding to in that last comment?  If it&#8217;s to me, then what I expressed wasn&#8217;t a flippant attempt to sidetrack the discussion, but rather something I&#8217;m really struggling with.  People like A.W. Pink leave me convinced that EVERYONE is going to Hell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iMonk</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/father-smith-instructs-jackson-on-indulgences-a-reformation-day-consideration/comment-page-4#comment-312393</link>
		<dc:creator>iMonk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 19:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/father-smith-instructs-jackson-on-indulgences-a-reformation-day-consideration#comment-312393</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not. It can be a problem, but I don&#039;t have time for that debate.

Read Shreiner and Canaday, The Race Set Before Us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not. It can be a problem, but I don&#8217;t have time for that debate.</p>
<p>Read Shreiner and Canaday, The Race Set Before Us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obed</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/father-smith-instructs-jackson-on-indulgences-a-reformation-day-consideration/comment-page-4#comment-312384</link>
		<dc:creator>Obed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 19:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/father-smith-instructs-jackson-on-indulgences-a-reformation-day-consideration#comment-312384</guid>
		<description>Confused

&lt;i&gt;â€¦then theyâ€™ll turn around and say, â€œBy the way, if you are doing A, B, or C, youâ€™re probably not elect.â€

Is this not just works snuck in through a back door?&lt;/i&gt;


Yep... scary, ain&#039;t it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Confused</p>
<p><i>â€¦then theyâ€™ll turn around and say, â€œBy the way, if you are doing A, B, or C, youâ€™re probably not elect.â€</p>
<p>Is this not just works snuck in through a back door?</i></p>
<p>Yep&#8230; scary, ain&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Lynch</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/father-smith-instructs-jackson-on-indulgences-a-reformation-day-consideration/comment-page-4#comment-312371</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Lynch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 18:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/father-smith-instructs-jackson-on-indulgences-a-reformation-day-consideration#comment-312371</guid>
		<description>Josh S, I&#039;ve always thought that grace as a quantifiable thing goes hand in hand with the OT scriptures where God talks about delivering various blessings, as if a blessing were a discreet thing. Jesus blesses things all the time, as did the men of the Temple, right? Disclaimer: I&#039;ve always understood grace and blessing to be sort of interchangeable.

I can&#039;t speak to the theology behind blessing at all, but, however appealing an purely noumenal view of grace might be, it&#039;s hard (for me, not knowing much) to reconcile it to what Jesus / the OT demonstrates about grace, blessing and cursing (and miracles, even?) - which I imagine to be within the same superaddition to our paradigm of reality that characterizes God&#039;s intervention in our lives. 

Jesus blessed stuff, and people. God blessed nations, men. It would seem, some more than others. The Protestant idea of grace is philosophically attractive to me, but I seem to remember from CCD that people have different amounts of charism - something I associate foggily with the parable of the talents, and stories from the OT about Elijah (or Elisha?) and items made holy. I can&#039;t make sense of how various instances of grace aren&#039;t somehow temporal quantities of grace, as well as a &quot;quality&quot; of God&#039;s added to reality somehow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Josh S, I&#8217;ve always thought that grace as a quantifiable thing goes hand in hand with the OT scriptures where God talks about delivering various blessings, as if a blessing were a discreet thing. Jesus blesses things all the time, as did the men of the Temple, right? Disclaimer: I&#8217;ve always understood grace and blessing to be sort of interchangeable.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t speak to the theology behind blessing at all, but, however appealing an purely noumenal view of grace might be, it&#8217;s hard (for me, not knowing much) to reconcile it to what Jesus / the OT demonstrates about grace, blessing and cursing (and miracles, even?) &#8211; which I imagine to be within the same superaddition to our paradigm of reality that characterizes God&#8217;s intervention in our lives. </p>
<p>Jesus blessed stuff, and people. God blessed nations, men. It would seem, some more than others. The Protestant idea of grace is philosophically attractive to me, but I seem to remember from CCD that people have different amounts of charism &#8211; something I associate foggily with the parable of the talents, and stories from the OT about Elijah (or Elisha?) and items made holy. I can&#8217;t make sense of how various instances of grace aren&#8217;t somehow temporal quantities of grace, as well as a &#8220;quality&#8221; of God&#8217;s added to reality somehow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iMonk</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/father-smith-instructs-jackson-on-indulgences-a-reformation-day-consideration/comment-page-4#comment-312307</link>
		<dc:creator>iMonk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 15:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/father-smith-instructs-jackson-on-indulgences-a-reformation-day-consideration#comment-312307</guid>
		<description>Jenny,

I appreciate that statement from the CCC, but I don&#039;t see how anyone can deny that the RCC believes that grace is, to a great extent, substantial and is dispensed by material means and church authority.

That someone saw past this is commendable. Merton wrote eloquently that grace was not ultimately a &quot;thing.&quot; But what view of grace is taught in Indulgences? You are getting &quot;this much&quot; and not &quot;all.&quot;

peace

MS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jenny,</p>
<p>I appreciate that statement from the CCC, but I don&#8217;t see how anyone can deny that the RCC believes that grace is, to a great extent, substantial and is dispensed by material means and church authority.</p>
<p>That someone saw past this is commendable. Merton wrote eloquently that grace was not ultimately a &#8220;thing.&#8221; But what view of grace is taught in Indulgences? You are getting &#8220;this much&#8221; and not &#8220;all.&#8221;</p>
<p>peace</p>
<p>MS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenny Bluett</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/father-smith-instructs-jackson-on-indulgences-a-reformation-day-consideration/comment-page-4#comment-312293</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenny Bluett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 14:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/father-smith-instructs-jackson-on-indulgences-a-reformation-day-consideration#comment-312293</guid>
		<description>&quot;Grace as thing God makes&quot; the connotation of &quot;thing&quot; hit me as negative; could just be internet ears, could be his intent. 

The &#039;thing&#039; in Catholic understanding is His life.  

CCC 2023 &quot;Sanctifying grace is the gratuitous gift of his life that God makes to us; it is infused by the Holy Spirit into the sould to heal it of sin and to santify it&quot;. 

Happy All Saints!
Jenny</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Grace as thing God makes&#8221; the connotation of &#8220;thing&#8221; hit me as negative; could just be internet ears, could be his intent. </p>
<p>The &#8216;thing&#8217; in Catholic understanding is His life.  </p>
<p>CCC 2023 &#8220;Sanctifying grace is the gratuitous gift of his life that God makes to us; it is infused by the Holy Spirit into the sould to heal it of sin and to santify it&#8221;. </p>
<p>Happy All Saints!<br />
Jenny</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

