<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Congregationalism First, Evangelicalism Later</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/congregationalism-first-evangelicalism-later/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/congregationalism-first-evangelicalism-later</link>
	<description>...dispatches from the post-evangelical wilderness</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:02:57 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/congregationalism-first-evangelicalism-later/comment-page-1#comment-278938</link>
		<dc:creator>thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 10:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/congregationalism-first-evangelicalism-later#comment-278938</guid>
		<description>As was widely recognized during the Reformation, if one challenges the Church (using Lenny Bruce&#039;s definition), the issue of church governance is a fundamental issue. Whether congregationalist, presbyterian or episcopal in viewpoint, one can&#039;t avoid ecclesial structure if one wishes to get beyond pure individualism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As was widely recognized during the Reformation, if one challenges the Church (using Lenny Bruce&#8217;s definition), the issue of church governance is a fundamental issue. Whether congregationalist, presbyterian or episcopal in viewpoint, one can&#8217;t avoid ecclesial structure if one wishes to get beyond pure individualism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve B</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/congregationalism-first-evangelicalism-later/comment-page-1#comment-278673</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 21:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/congregationalism-first-evangelicalism-later#comment-278673</guid>
		<description>Great post! Evangelicalism can be very happy by simply isolating itself into Individualism, which is the antithesis of Evangelism. A renewed sense of Evangelicalism as the Spirit-led, Christ-loving, Gospel-living, Word-trusting, Grace-relating people of God, people living out the incredible message of a vital and real relationship with God together in Christ would be well worth resurrecting. 

But let&#039;s not ditch the word for anything &quot;post&quot; - post-evangelicalism, post-church, or post-rational. Let&#039;s move forward, toward Christ, not away from a word hollowed of meaning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post! Evangelicalism can be very happy by simply isolating itself into Individualism, which is the antithesis of Evangelism. A renewed sense of Evangelicalism as the Spirit-led, Christ-loving, Gospel-living, Word-trusting, Grace-relating people of God, people living out the incredible message of a vital and real relationship with God together in Christ would be well worth resurrecting. </p>
<p>But let&#8217;s not ditch the word for anything &#8220;post&#8221; &#8211; post-evangelicalism, post-church, or post-rational. Let&#8217;s move forward, toward Christ, not away from a word hollowed of meaning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
